<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weather vs. Climate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: There's a Drought—Is It Climate Change? &#124; Surprising Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-4704</link>
		<dc:creator>There's a Drought—Is It Climate Change? &#124; Surprising Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=1611#comment-4704</guid>
		<description>[...] how I explained it a couple years ago: In short, weather is a data point. Climate is a collection of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how I explained it a couple years ago: In short, weather is a data point. Climate is a collection of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whether the Weather Is Climate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Whether the Weather Is Climate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=1611#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>[...] increase in Britain over the next century. A better explanation would have involved explaining the difference between &#8216;weather&#8217; and &#8216;climate&#8217;, whereby long-term trends (over thirty years) can change without necessarily being obvious in every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] increase in Britain over the next century. A better explanation would have involved explaining the difference between &#8216;weather&#8217; and &#8216;climate&#8217;, whereby long-term trends (over thirty years) can change without necessarily being obvious in every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change: Why We Worry &#124; Surprising Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Change: Why We Worry &#124; Surprising Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=1611#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>[...] shocked by these results. Every time we write about anthropogenic climate change in the magazine or online, readers write to us saying that we&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] shocked by these results. Every time we write about anthropogenic climate change in the magazine or online, readers write to us saying that we&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis DuBay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis DuBay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 21:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=1611#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Stanley,

A trend from 2000 to 2009 does not describe a climate.  Look at this link to see what a trend in climate looks like for a more reasonable time period, the last 130 years.

http://thisviewofearth.blogspot.com/2009/08/2009-year-to-date-land-and-sea.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stanley,</p>
<p>A trend from 2000 to 2009 does not describe a climate.  Look at this link to see what a trend in climate looks like for a more reasonable time period, the last 130 years.</p>
<p><a href="http://thisviewofearth.blogspot.com/2009/08/2009-year-to-date-land-and-sea.html" rel="nofollow">http://thisviewofearth.blogspot.com/2009/08/2009-year-to-date-land-and-sea.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stanley kimmel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>stanley kimmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=1611#comment-887</guid>
		<description>How can you say the temperatures have been rising, since they have been falling since 2000? CO2 is as beneficial as oxygen, without it we would all parish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you say the temperatures have been rising, since they have been falling since 2000? CO2 is as beneficial as oxygen, without it we would all parish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang Ortloff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/08/weather-vs-climate/comment-page-1/#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang Ortloff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=1611#comment-873</guid>
		<description>nice article but you can say it much shorter:
Climate is what we expect
Weather is what we get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article but you can say it much shorter:<br />
Climate is what we expect<br />
Weather is what we get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
