<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten Movies We Loved From the 2000s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-11065</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-11065</guid>
		<description>With regards to Avatar, no one seems to mention that the material concern in the movie (unobtanium, blech) appears to be a room temperature superconductor as seen in an approximately 5 second scene with a chunk of the substance on a desk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to Avatar, no one seems to mention that the material concern in the movie (unobtanium, blech) appears to be a room temperature superconductor as seen in an approximately 5 second scene with a chunk of the substance on a desk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NASA Picks Best &#38; Worst Sci-Fi Movies. What Are Yours? &#124; Surprising Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>NASA Picks Best &#38; Worst Sci-Fi Movies. What Are Yours? &#124; Surprising Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>[...] looking at the lists, I think we can conclude that the last couple of decades has been both good and bad when it comes to sci-fi in the movies. Special effects can make our imagination come to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking at the lists, I think we can conclude that the last couple of decades has been both good and bad when it comes to sci-fi in the movies. Special effects can make our imagination come to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrainFood42</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1895</link>
		<dc:creator>BrainFood42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 16:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1895</guid>
		<description>In a bow to &quot;make believe science&quot; riddled with real science, how about The Fifth Element, Forbidden Planet, ET, Solaris, The Day the Earth Stood Still (the original) &amp; Slaughterhouse-Five?
Then of course the great movie classics which are science riddled with potential future science: Serenity, Soylent Green, On the Beach, Contact, Bicentennial Man, Blade Runner, The Andromeda Strain, Silent Running, Westworld and of course, 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Enjoy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a bow to &#8220;make believe science&#8221; riddled with real science, how about The Fifth Element, Forbidden Planet, ET, Solaris, The Day the Earth Stood Still (the original) &#038; Slaughterhouse-Five?<br />
Then of course the great movie classics which are science riddled with potential future science: Serenity, Soylent Green, On the Beach, Contact, Bicentennial Man, Blade Runner, The Andromeda Strain, Silent Running, Westworld and of course, 2001: A Space Odyssey.<br />
Enjoy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1574</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1574</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised that you left Avatar off of your list. Not because it does not deserve to be on the list, but simply because you appear to favor only those movies which contain genetic evolutionary elements. However, what you seem to fail to realize is that there is room to consider the premise of an evolving spiritual conscience within the human race. Disregarding temporarily the premise of an all powerful omnipotent being, mankind is not without the certain element of collectivism, most usually used as a forum for common good. Today&#039;s mediums, especially the internet, have connected mankind like never before. Avatar&#039;s representation of that collectivism is substantial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that you left Avatar off of your list. Not because it does not deserve to be on the list, but simply because you appear to favor only those movies which contain genetic evolutionary elements. However, what you seem to fail to realize is that there is room to consider the premise of an evolving spiritual conscience within the human race. Disregarding temporarily the premise of an all powerful omnipotent being, mankind is not without the certain element of collectivism, most usually used as a forum for common good. Today&#8217;s mediums, especially the internet, have connected mankind like never before. Avatar&#8217;s representation of that collectivism is substantial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick the Hat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1567</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick the Hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1567</guid>
		<description>Danny Boyle&#039;s Sunshine (2007) was a sleeper hit for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danny Boyle&#8217;s Sunshine (2007) was a sleeper hit for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Education</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Watching movies with extensive technical influence is a major part of geek life. These movies provide inspiration and insight into many technological advancement that can be implemented into real life situations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Watching movies with extensive technical influence is a major part of geek life. These movies provide inspiration and insight into many technological advancement that can be implemented into real life situations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Avatar....Hands down the best!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avatar&#8230;.Hands down the best!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David C</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1511</link>
		<dc:creator>David C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1511</guid>
		<description>What about Sunshine and Moon? Granted, neither had wide cinema coverage, but they were both good in their own ways. Definitly different from your &quot;average&quot; sci-fi fare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Sunshine and Moon? Granted, neither had wide cinema coverage, but they were both good in their own ways. Definitly different from your &#8220;average&#8221; sci-fi fare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>To follow up on Mr. Estrada&#039;s comments - I think you overlooked the valuable lessons of what can happen if bitten by a radioactive spider that were finally brought to our attention by the latest Spiderman franchise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To follow up on Mr. Estrada&#8217;s comments &#8211; I think you overlooked the valuable lessons of what can happen if bitten by a radioactive spider that were finally brought to our attention by the latest Spiderman franchise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Estrada</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1469</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Estrada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1469</guid>
		<description>Follow-up to previous comment. Heath Ledger, who played the Joker in THE DARK KNIGHT won the 2008 Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor. Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow-up to previous comment. Heath Ledger, who played the Joker in THE DARK KNIGHT won the 2008 Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor. Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abraham Estrada</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Abraham Estrada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>Why are BATMAN BEGINS &amp; THE DARK KNIGHT not on the list? These 2 movies made Batman more popular than Superman ever was. Batman is part of pop culture since 1939. There has been more movies made about Batman than any other superhero. He is the most human of all because he doesn&#039;t have any powers or isn&#039;t a mutant.

BIG MISTAKE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are BATMAN BEGINS &amp; THE DARK KNIGHT not on the list? These 2 movies made Batman more popular than Superman ever was. Batman is part of pop culture since 1939. There has been more movies made about Batman than any other superhero. He is the most human of all because he doesn&#8217;t have any powers or isn&#8217;t a mutant.</p>
<p>BIG MISTAKE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Shooster</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Shooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>Donnie Darko should be on this list. It incorporates time travel and paranoid schizophrenia, along with other elements of science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie Darko should be on this list. It incorporates time travel and paranoid schizophrenia, along with other elements of science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1465</guid>
		<description>there are a lot that deserve to be on this list but these are the obvious ones that come to mind:

the russian film &quot;ugly swans&quot; (gadkie lebedi, 2006) - amazing movie, mostly about human evolution.

the spanish film &quot;los cronocrimenes&quot; (timecrimes, 2007) - great time travel movie about human nature. 

&quot;naqoyqatsi&quot; (2002) - portrays quite frighteningly some of the implications of our sciences.

and then there&#039;s a couple good old entertaining holywood sci-fi fare with good questions/messages:

&quot;minority report&quot; (2002) and &quot;district 9&quot; (2009)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are a lot that deserve to be on this list but these are the obvious ones that come to mind:</p>
<p>the russian film &#8220;ugly swans&#8221; (gadkie lebedi, 2006) &#8211; amazing movie, mostly about human evolution.</p>
<p>the spanish film &#8220;los cronocrimenes&#8221; (timecrimes, 2007) &#8211; great time travel movie about human nature. </p>
<p>&#8220;naqoyqatsi&#8221; (2002) &#8211; portrays quite frighteningly some of the implications of our sciences.</p>
<p>and then there&#8217;s a couple good old entertaining holywood sci-fi fare with good questions/messages:</p>
<p>&#8220;minority report&#8221; (2002) and &#8220;district 9&#8243; (2009)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Helmuth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2009/12/ten-movies-we-loved-from-the-2000s/comment-page-1/#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Helmuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=2610#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>Winged Migration had some gorgeous footage of flying birds. Unfortunately, the narration was inane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winged Migration had some gorgeous footage of flying birds. Unfortunately, the narration was inane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
