Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


March 31, 2010

Accepting the Idea of Extinction

Some scientists say that we are living in a new epoch of geological time—one they call the Anthropocene—that is marked by what may be the sixth mass extinction in the history of our planet. A scary number of creatures have gone extinct in recent human memory, some of them even in my lifetime. No one today argues that extinction is impossible, like they do with evolution, but it wasn’t always that way.

Extinction is a fairly new concept in human thought. Shelley Emling explains in The Fossil Hunter:

For centuries, Christians were convinced that Genesis told the true story of creation. Fossils only reinforced the biblical account. For example, some fossils were found at such high altitudes that people thought they must surely have been deposited there as a result of the worldwide flood depicted in Genesis….After all, the Bible stated that God created the heavens and the earth and every living thing in it in just six days. There was never any mention of a prehistory and therefore never any mention of prehistoric animals….In general, very few people doubted the Bible’s veracity.

Mastodons and other fossilized creatures challenged the idea that God's Earth was unchanging (via wikimedia commons)

Mastodons and other fossilized creatures challenged the idea that God's Earth was unchanging (via wikimedia commons)

Today people argue against evolution by citing the Bible, and 300 years ago they argued against extinction citing that same source. The world, they said, was exactly as God had made it 6,000 years before and it hadn’t changed since then.

But the fossils kept coming. In England, Mary Anning and others were digging up ichthyosaurs and pleisiosaurs and other fossils that didn’t look like anything living. In Siberia, Russians were finding woolly mammoths. And in the United States, Americans were digging up mammoths and mastodons. Richard Conniff writes in the April issue of Smithsonian:

The discovery of such monstrous creatures raised troubling questions. [French naturalist Georges] Cuvier made the case that both mammoths and mastodons had vanished from the face of the earth; their bones were just too different from any known pachyderm. It was the first time the scientific world accepted the idea that any species had gone extinct—a challenge to the doctrine that species were a permanent, unchanging heritage from the Garden of Eden. The disappearance of such creatures also cast doubt on the idea that the earth was just 6,000 years old, as the Bible seemed to teach.

In fact, mammoths and mastodons shook the foundations of conventional thought. In place of the orderly old world, where each species had its proper place in a great chain of being, Cuvier was soon depicting a chaotic past in which flood, ice and earthquake swept away “living organisms without number,” leaving behind only scattered bones and dust.

Eventually the evidence was overwhelming—there were thousands upon thousands of creatures that no longer existed. Extinction was reality and no one argues otherwise anymore. In fact, we now know that the rate of extinction has changed over time and reached five peaks called mass extinctions (the most familiar will be the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction event, 65 million years ago, which wiped out the dinosaurs). We may be on our way to a sixth.

But how can people have come to understand that extinction is real—and thus God’s world must have changed and is doing so before our very eyes—but still think that evolution is bunk? I don’t have an easy answer to this (and if any creationists stumble upon this, please explain your views in the comments below), but it might have something to do with the nature of the evidence. It is easier to believe that creatures have ceased to exist, especially when you can see that happening right now, than it is to visualize the path from, say, Ardi to humans. Evolution is a slow process that takes place over long periods of time, and the bits we can see—like the changes in flu viruses from year to year or a single bird species slowly diverging into two—can be easy for some to dismiss. That extinction became an accepted concept gives me hope, however, that more people may one day accept evolution as well.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

6 Comments »

  1. [...] Earth was the way God created it 6,000 years ago, and that’s that, they said. Here’s that blog post. Check out the other recent posts, too – she’s got some nice stuff there, from whether [...]

  2. Ivo says:

    How about God (i.e. aliens) comes periodically and “refreshes” the flora and fauna on the Earth with new models of species with genetic enhancement… or something like that… I still don’t believe in evolution as a “natural” process.

  3. Evolution v. Flat Earth Society

    Hard to see that this debate is not simply a continuation of: “The earth can’t possibly revolve around the sun!” Or, “Heavenly bodies can’t possibly have elliptical orbits!” And even, “The Moon can’t possibly have mountains.” All scientific discoveries outrageously violating deeply held religious beliefs. Today, with tons of fossils housed in universities, museums and the like, added to that the fact that we can see real-time evolution in tiny fast-breeding organisms, the denial of evolution through natural selection has truly become Flat Earth Society. If a Creator needs to be kept central, why not bite the reality bullet and simply say that God set the whole thing into motion, or that he monitors the entire amazing process? That could never be proven wrong. This would save a lot of time and energy of having to have fall-back battle after fall-back battle as scientific evidence embarrassingly piles up to Everest heights. But the most important thing is that, whether God created the earth’s species or not, surely almost everyone should be able to agree that we have no right to conduct our current campaign of mass extermination against them.
    - – - -
    Border Enforcement + Immigration Moratorium = Job, Crime and Eco Sanity.

  4. [...] irony, of course, is that we’re also living in a time of numerous extinctions. But that’s a subject for another [...]

  5. Jane says:

    Simply because the world has changed does not prove that the Creationist belief is bunk. The world changes; this is a universal truth that cannot be denied by either Evolutionists or Creationists. What is meant by “the earth is the way it was 600 years ago when God created it” is that the processes are the same. Plants, animals, people reproduce and die. Wind erodes mountains, the sea deposits sediment, and the tectonic plates shift. These processes do not change without an external force acting on them.

  6. Christie Finn says:

    One of the best examples of evolution as well as extinction theory is the story of the evolution of the horse from it’s ancient ancestors. The horse did not evolve linearly, but through many branches until finally, there is but one genus Equus and eight species. The story of Equus agrees with geological events and plate tectonics as well as the predictable changes in the Earth’s climate based on periodic glacial and interglacial eras that have occurred in an amazingly predictable manner throughout time. These variations in the tilt of the plane of the Earth’s axis explain why the Northern hemisphere is in a warming phase while Antartic ice sheets grow thicker. This theory is currently the most accepted by NASA.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement