Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


June 17, 2010

Five Myths of the Gulf Oil Spill

Oil slicks are not rare events (photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Tasha Tully, courtesy flickr user Deepwater Horizon Response)

Oil slicks are not rare events (photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Tasha Tully, courtesy flickr user Deepwater Horizon Response)

With oil spilling from the floor of the Gulf of Mexico for nearly two months now, it’s not shocking that there’s plenty of misinformation and wrongful assumptions passing over airwaves and in conversations with friends and colleagues. Here are five myths I’ve heard lately:

Oil spills are rare: There are hundreds of oil spills around the world every year; oil is lost during both extraction from the ground and transport in ships and through pipes. In the United States, there have been more than a dozen spills in the last decade, including one in Utah last week. But it’s easy to ignore here, unless the spill reaches the level of Deepwater Horizon or Exxon Valdez. In Nigeria, a country blessed—or cursed—with vast oil reserves, there are 175 oil spills on average each year. Even if we believe the oil companies’ claim that the frequency of spills has been decreasing, it’s hard to believe them when they say such events are rare.

Shallow water drilling is safe: No drilling is risk-free. Drilling in shallow water may, theoretically, make it easier to fix a spewing well but that may not happen in reality: The worst accidental oil spill currently on the record books, Ixtoc I, occurred in only 160 feet of water. It has eerie similarities to Deepwater Horizon—it occurred in the Gulf as the result of a blowout—and it took nearly 10 months to be capped.

BP/the government/the military can just shut off the oil whenever they want: The magic cutoff switch doesn’t exist. If anything, that switch would have been the blowout preventer, which was the bit that failed and allowed the catastrophe to happen. BP is currently drilling relief wells that they hope will allow them to cap off the original well, but that will not happen until August. That nuclear option that pops into the news every couple of weeks? That isn’t, and shouldn’t be, on the table.

Building barrier islands will protect wetlands: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will soon construct 45 miles of artificial berms off the coast of Louisiana. They are intended to protect Mississippi Delta wetlands. However, dredging the sea floor to create the islands will destroy the creatures that live on an in the seabed. The berms may restrict the flow of water that the wetlands depend on and prevent tides from washing away the oil that is already there. They may redirect the oil to other environmentally sensitive areas. And it is not clear how long the islands will last; they would quickly wash away in a storm.

The Gulf coast will be better than before: Sure, given enough time and some help, the Gulf ecosystem will adapt and recover from the oil spill. But the longer this goes on and the more oil dumped into the sea, the longer that will take. And who knows what we’ll lose permanently?



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

3 Comments »

  1. Christine says:

    More on the oil spill, including how scientists from the Smithsonian and other organizations are helping answer questions about the spill’s effects: http://ocean.si.edu/ocean-and-you/gulf-oil-spill

  2. jeannie hoffman says:

    What takes up the space underground that was occupied by the oil? Is it possible to create a huge sink hole where oil has been pumped from the underground space?

  3. Some good news and bad news, in reverse order.

    1) The blowout preventer failed due to multiple decisions before the blowout that were neglectful of the BOP, or incompetent, or both. This was not an accident, but the result of deep-seated greed and neglect (in case anyone had doubts).

    2) One ray of hope: the giant spill in 1979 (the current one will be much larger before it is capped) was not treated with dispersants. Due to the warm climate, oil eating bacteria consumed almost all the oil within two years. But: some species may not recover from the current toxic environment, and the dispersant is a new factor, highly toxic but perhaps used to hide the high rate of oil flow from the ocean floor.

    So, no one is sure what the longer term results will be.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us



Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement