June 11, 2010
Should Oiled Birds Be Cleaned?
Dead birds smothered in icky, gooey brown oil are the iconic images of most any oil spill, including the ongoing one in the Gulf. Even a small amount of oil can kill a bird. Oil sticks to feathers, destroying their waterproofing ability and exposing the bird to extremes of temperature. And ingested oil can harm internal organs.
The birds that survive long enough to be rescued can often be cleaned. The International Bird Rescue Research Center has treated birds from more than 150 spills over the last four decades, and it has teamed up with Tri-State Bird Rescue to wash birds rescued from the Gulf spill.
Cleaning the birds is a multi-step process, and it can be a stressful one for the bird. Beforehand, the bird is examined and its health stabilized. It may be suffering from exhaustion, dehydration, hypothermia or the toxic effects of ingested oil. Once the bird is healthy enough to handle the ordeal of washing, trained staff and volunteers clean it in a tub of warm water mixed with one percent Dawn dishwashing detergent. (IBRRC discovered in the late 1970s not only that Dawn was great at removing oil, but also that it didn’t irritate birds’ skin or eyes and could even be ingested—accidentally, of course—without harm.) When the water is dirty, the bird is moved to a second tub, and so on, until the water remains clean. Then the bird is thoroughly rinsed. Once it is dry, the bird will preen and restore the overlapping, weatherproof pattern of its feathers. After it is deemed healthy, the bird is released to an oil-free area.
Cleaning one bird can take hours and up to 300 gallons of water. Survival rates are about 50 to 80 percent on average, the IBRRC says, though this depends on the species. (As of earlier this week, the center had rescued 442 live birds, 40 of which had been cleaned were healthy enough to be released back into the wild.)
Some scientists, however, have questioned the value of putting so much effort into saving birds when the benefits are unclear. “It might make us feel better to clean them up and send them back out,” University of California, Davis ornithologist Daniel Anderson told Newsweek. “But there’s a real question of how much it actually does for the birds, aside from prolong their suffering.”
There is no long-term data on survival after the birds have been released. But there is concern that many birds may simply return to their oil-soaked homes to die. And there is evidence that the survivors have shorter life spans and fewer surviving chicks.
But it’s hard to just leave these creatures to die, especially as they have been harmed by a man-made disaster. To me, at least, it seems irresponsible to not even try. As we begin to measure the damage from this spill, leaving these innocent victims on their own shouldn’t be an option.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
11 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

























I think the point about birds returning to their oil-soaked homes to get dirty again and die is a good one … but we need data to determine.
From a biologic viewpoint, if the birds survive to breed then does it matter if their lifespans are shortened?
Humans have created this disaster for these creatures. It is only right that we do what we can to save them. No matter what it takes. It is Humankinds responsibility to be kind and right the wrong that BP has done to an ecosystem. BP has the main responibility but we all carry some of the responsibility to what has happened in the Gulf.
I think compassion compels us to respond and care for them. As someone else said – humans created this disaster – a form or environmental abuse.
I am a 3 time cancer survivor, and even though my expected life span may be shorter than others, I am glad no one said “Why bother saving her?”
Oil spills and toxic chemicals seem to be the two substances that cause the most stressing conditions for birds in their natural environment. I think the birds should be cleaned as soon as possible and then banded and monitored, if possible, to create survival data. I had a 6-month old kitten that jumped into a bucket of car oil and, after tramatic cleaning, seemed to be fine and glad to be rid of the oil. The most critical factor is how long the bird has been covered in the oil. The sooner the birds are found and cleaned, the better the chances for survival. Kudos to those who are doing the work of cleaning and relocating!
Included in the cleaning of the birds, it would be a good idea to band and possibly fit with transmission materials so that a good reading on how successfully the birds cope after being cleaned can be obtained. It would tell us whether they return to the same place, how long they live, how successful they are at breeding. This seems like it would be valuable information, and this situation seems ideal for gathering this data.
If my body was strong enough to clean a big Pelican, and
If I was able to do that then it’s MY business. It is no body elses business. To heck with what other people think is practical. —Richard
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kevin Marshall, Carrie. Carrie said: RT @KevinMarshall: http://bit.ly/ayQcCQ – towards the bottom. [...]
I believe they should be cleaned and cared for. Why is their life (or any creature’s life, for that matter)any less significant than a human’s. We made the mess, we need to clean it up!
In 40 years, IBRRC has identified 400+ birds, of which it has determined that 40 could be released back to the wild. This is an amazingly low success rate, even assuming that all of them will live happy lives. The amount of effort that went into “saving” these 40 birds is not worth it. The problem is convincing those people who benefitted from scrubbing the unfortunate birds to enjoy doing something that will be worth the effort.
Stuart, I think you misread this. They had released only 40 birds from the current spill, not in the whole of their existence. As of today, they’ve now rescued more than 600 live birds and released 42. The release takes a while because they have to stabilize the birds’ health and clean them—this happens over days to weeks—and only once they’re sure that the birds are healthy enough do they release them into the wild. So right now they have pens full of live birds and most of them will eventually end up back in the wild.
[...] time and effort to clean the animals up, or would it be better to just let them die? Last June, I wrote: Some scientists, however, have questioned the value of putting so much effort into saving birds [...]