Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


August 18, 2011

Same-Sex Finch Couples Form Strong Bonds

Captive zebra finches (courtesy of flickr user psmithson)

I’m sure this pains the people who take offense at the true-life tale And Tango Makes Three, but heterosexuality is not the rule in the animal world. There are hundreds of species, from bison to bunnies to beetles, that pair off in same-sex couples. (And then there are bonobos.) Birds often pair off this way, too. And now a study of zebra finches, published in Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, has found that the bonds between same-sex couples can be just as strong as those in heterosexual birds.

Zebra finches, which live in grasslands and forests of Australia and Indonesia, form pairs that last a lifetime. The males sing to their partners, and the two share a nest and clean each other’s feathers. They nestle together and greet each other by nuzzling beaks.

Researchers raised groups of zebra finches in same-sex groups, all male and all female, and in each group the majority of birds paired up. They interacted frequently and often preened their partners. And they weren’t aggressive to each other as they were to other birds in the group. These are all characteristics found in heterosexual finch couples.

The scientists then tested the bonds in the male-male couples by introducing some females to the party. A few birds were tempted by the ladies, but when the females were removed, the male-male couples reformed.

“A pair-bond in socially monogamous species represents a cooperative partnership that may give advantages for survival,” lead author Julie Elie, of the University of California Berkeley, told BBC News. “Finding a social partner, whatever its sex, could be a priority.” Having a mate could help a bird to find food or repel predators.

Elie also told BBC News, “relationships in animals can be more complicated than just a male and a female who meet and reproduce, even in birds.” Or in humans.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

10 Comments »

  1. Lot says:

    Doesn’t this prove that depriving these creatures of the opportunity to mate with the opposite sex facilitated same sex attraction? The birds didn’t have a choice.

  2. Shoe says:

    In same sex pairings, do they see the male/female roles played out? Does one sing more to the other, or do males both sing to each other, and females don’t?

  3. Sarah Zielinski says:

    @Lot Yes, the scientists manipulated the situation in order to get the initial pairs (but the birds didn’t have to pair up, and not all of them did, just like real life). And when they introduced females, most of the guys in male-male couples paid no attention at all.

    @Shoe The study didn’t go into details about that. Perhaps its the next step in this work.

  4. NotSo says:

    To compare to human same sex couples the key question is “did they have sex?” if not then it is more comparable to same sex friendship in humans than same sex coupling.

  5. Rationale says:

    @ Lot and NotSo: The subject was same-sex “pair bonding,” not gay or straight birds. It happens throughout the animal kingdom… including humans. A bond does not require the sex act. It is safe for the both of you to bond to each no matter what your gender.

  6. PaulErdos says:

    Surprising? Hardly, Sarah.

    Despite the best attempts of Sarah to convince us that homosex is normal, this feeble effort fails.

    “Notso” brings up a good point–the article is strangely silent on this fact.

    But, in any event, facultative same sex behavior has been known for a long time. Even in homo sap, we know that men in prisons substitute weaker, effiminate men for women.

    It’s preferential, obligate homosexuality that is mysterious and exceedingly rare. The animals in the same-sex pairing still obeyed the biological imperative to reproduce. Homosexuals–as we understand the term–have no interest in heterosexual mating behavior. This is the evolutationary conundrum.

    This piece, Sarah, is not an apples to apples comparison.

  7. Superkawaii says:

    @PaulErdos: Most creatures in the animal kingdom don’t have recreational sex because they don’t get enjoyment out of it. Often, it is a painful act.
    The study deals with bonding, mates, and the fluidity of sexuality in finches. The article suggests parallels that might be drawn to human bonding.
    In any case, the birds’ monogamous nature and the preference of some to stay with their same-sex partner may suggest that homosexuality can be influenced by environmental and non-environmental factors both?

  8. [...] 4. Mother nature. More gay than you might think [...]

  9. [...] by Lilian Nattel in Miscellany via blogs.smithsonianmag.com [...]

  10. [...] today and saw this article (Same-Sex Finch Couples Form Strong Bonds) mentioned over at Lilian’s [...]

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us



Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement