<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fossil Finds Complicate Search for Human Ancestor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 19:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Wolfsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-6408</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha Wolfsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-6408</guid>
		<description>Okay, let&#039;s see if I have this straight. More and more non-Homo sapien hominid fossils appearing every year means less and less evidence for evolution??

And problems (long since resolved, btw) with carbon dating--which is never, ever used on finds this old-- is somehow proof of, well, er, gee.... How, exactly does that disprove evolution, guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, let&#8217;s see if I have this straight. More and more non-Homo sapien hominid fossils appearing every year means less and less evidence for evolution??</p>
<p>And problems (long since resolved, btw) with carbon dating&#8211;which is never, ever used on finds this old&#8211; is somehow proof of, well, er, gee&#8230;. How, exactly does that disprove evolution, guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-6355</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-6355</guid>
		<description>Sorry I meant in addition to, not since</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I meant in addition to, not since</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sapa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-6354</link>
		<dc:creator>Sapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-6354</guid>
		<description>There have been more revelations since this article, the &quot;hobbit&quot; people and the Denisovans. I can&#039;t see why anyone clings to the theory of evolution when the evidence doesn&#039;t support it. 
When I indicated in my first year lectures that I did not &quot;believe&quot; this theory, no-one asked me for an explanation. (I don&#039;t accept ontological explanations.) 
In response to SW above it doesn&#039;t take a great deal of intelligence to realise that the truth may lead you somewhere you aren&#039;t expecting. I would much rather be the odd one out than be blinded by self deception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been more revelations since this article, the &#8220;hobbit&#8221; people and the Denisovans. I can&#8217;t see why anyone clings to the theory of evolution when the evidence doesn&#8217;t support it.<br />
When I indicated in my first year lectures that I did not &#8220;believe&#8221; this theory, no-one asked me for an explanation. (I don&#8217;t accept ontological explanations.)<br />
In response to SW above it doesn&#8217;t take a great deal of intelligence to realise that the truth may lead you somewhere you aren&#8217;t expecting. I would much rather be the odd one out than be blinded by self deception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torbjörn Larsson, OM</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-6267</link>
		<dc:creator>Torbjörn Larsson, OM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 23:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-6267</guid>
		<description>Seems &quot;problem solved&quot; means &quot;problem raised&quot;, seeing that the predictions already successfully made (say, such human ancestry) are rejected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems &#8220;problem solved&#8221; means &#8220;problem raised&#8221;, seeing that the predictions already successfully made (say, such human ancestry) are rejected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to Hominid Hunting &#124; Hominid Hunting</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to Hominid Hunting &#124; Hominid Hunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 20:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-5576</guid>
		<description>[...] had previously thought impossible. And just last month, new work on the recently discovered Australopithecus sediba challenged traditional ideas on the transition to own genus, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] had previously thought impossible. And just last month, new work on the recently discovered Australopithecus sediba challenged traditional ideas on the transition to own genus, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-5455</link>
		<dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-5455</guid>
		<description>The comment above displays an absolutely mind boggling degree of lack of intelligence and education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment above displays an absolutely mind boggling degree of lack of intelligence and education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Problem solved</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2011/09/fossil-finds-complicate-search-for-human-ancestor/comment-page-1/#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>Problem solved</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=7403#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>We didn&#039;t evolve and carbon dating doesn&#039;t work.  There, problem solved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn&#8217;t evolve and carbon dating doesn&#8217;t work.  There, problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
