<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Fracking&#8217; for Natural Gas Is Linked With Earthquakes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:47:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/comment-page-1/#comment-7239</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=11184#comment-7239</guid>
		<description>The bias in this article is rather disappointing. Especially where you say &quot;proponents argue...&quot; and &quot;opponents note...&quot;, which make it sound like one side is giving only opinions, the other facts.

The reality is that shale gas and oil development has definitely, unarguably, increased domestic oil and gas production, and has definitely, unarguably, lowered prices. These statistics are readily observable in any number of places, mostly concisely at the EIA website.

On the other hand, the claims of widespread environmental damage are either exaggerated or shown by thorough analysis to be utterly false. Despite trying really hard, the anti-development folks have yet to find a definitive case of fracking fluids contaminating potable aquifers, and the flaming faucets in certain films have been shown to be products of naturally-occurring shallow methane, or simple fabrication (one can buy &quot;flaming faucet&quot; kits on the internet.)

Furthermore, the earthquakes in question are thought to be caused by a tiny share of the tens of thousands of injection disposal wells in the country, and not oil and gas wells, which are usually far too shallow to affect seismic activity. You conflate the two types of well a bit too easily, especially in the title of this article.

I would expect science and not activism from a source like the Smithsonian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bias in this article is rather disappointing. Especially where you say &#8220;proponents argue&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;opponents note&#8230;&#8221;, which make it sound like one side is giving only opinions, the other facts.</p>
<p>The reality is that shale gas and oil development has definitely, unarguably, increased domestic oil and gas production, and has definitely, unarguably, lowered prices. These statistics are readily observable in any number of places, mostly concisely at the EIA website.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the claims of widespread environmental damage are either exaggerated or shown by thorough analysis to be utterly false. Despite trying really hard, the anti-development folks have yet to find a definitive case of fracking fluids contaminating potable aquifers, and the flaming faucets in certain films have been shown to be products of naturally-occurring shallow methane, or simple fabrication (one can buy &#8220;flaming faucet&#8221; kits on the internet.)</p>
<p>Furthermore, the earthquakes in question are thought to be caused by a tiny share of the tens of thousands of injection disposal wells in the country, and not oil and gas wells, which are usually far too shallow to affect seismic activity. You conflate the two types of well a bit too easily, especially in the title of this article.</p>
<p>I would expect science and not activism from a source like the Smithsonian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mariangela</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/comment-page-1/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>mariangela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 23:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=11184#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>What about the earthquake in Italy (Emilia) last May? Local poptulation claimed it was related to some fracking investigations made by an oil company (they were complaining about this also before the earthquake). The company denied any link with their invstigations, and so did the government, but this news sounds scary now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the earthquake in Italy (Emilia) last May? Local poptulation claimed it was related to some fracking investigations made by an oil company (they were complaining about this also before the earthquake). The company denied any link with their invstigations, and so did the government, but this news sounds scary now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: podrock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/comment-page-1/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>podrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=11184#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>A bit of a nit-pick here...the fluids do not lubricate a fault (reduce friction). The increase in pore pressure lowers the pressure needed to have the fault fail. Basically, the walls of the fault are pushed apart by the pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of a nit-pick here&#8230;the fluids do not lubricate a fault (reduce friction). The increase in pore pressure lowers the pressure needed to have the fault fail. Basically, the walls of the fault are pushed apart by the pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/comment-page-1/#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=11184#comment-7233</guid>
		<description>I am sure Rep Gohmert and his likes (looking at you Inhofe) have a perfect explanation for this. How this is gods doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure Rep Gohmert and his likes (looking at you Inhofe) have a perfect explanation for this. How this is gods doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annette mcloughlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/08/fracking-for-natural-gas-is-linked-with-earthquakes/comment-page-1/#comment-7232</link>
		<dc:creator>annette mcloughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=11184#comment-7232</guid>
		<description>I WONDER WHY THESE SCIENTISTS ARE SO SURPRISED BY WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE EARTH !!!!!,ITS BLATENTLY OBVIOUS THEY ARE SLOWLY DESTROYING THE PLANET !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WONDER WHY THESE SCIENTISTS ARE SO SURPRISED BY WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE EARTH !!!!!,ITS BLATENTLY OBVIOUS THEY ARE SLOWLY DESTROYING THE PLANET !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
