<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A New Leap Forward for Radiocarbon Dating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/10/a-new-leap-forward-for-radiocarbon-dating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/10/a-new-leap-forward-for-radiocarbon-dating/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 23:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebeca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/10/a-new-leap-forward-for-radiocarbon-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-8111</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebeca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=12616#comment-8111</guid>
		<description>Some very interesting Theories :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very interesting Theories :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbie McConnell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/10/a-new-leap-forward-for-radiocarbon-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-7695</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbie McConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=12616#comment-7695</guid>
		<description>How does carbon dating reconcile itself with the law of Thermodynamics, that is that everything is essentially eternal in nature - that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, so that the atoms inside anything are essentially ageless?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does carbon dating reconcile itself with the law of Thermodynamics, that is that everything is essentially eternal in nature &#8211; that matter can neither be created nor destroyed, so that the atoms inside anything are essentially ageless?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/10/a-new-leap-forward-for-radiocarbon-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-7691</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=12616#comment-7691</guid>
		<description>but how do you know that the C14 content shall be the same all over? no regional differences between that lake in Japan and the deserts in Egypt and the freezing conditions in Russia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but how do you know that the C14 content shall be the same all over? no regional differences between that lake in Japan and the deserts in Egypt and the freezing conditions in Russia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B. Wyse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2012/10/a-new-leap-forward-for-radiocarbon-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-7689</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Wyse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 05:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=12616#comment-7689</guid>
		<description>The state of general science knowledge in America is poor and articles in a magazine like Smithsonian should not have several blatant errors. First radioactive atoms decay not degrade. Second C-14 dating compares to ratio of
C-14 to C-12 not N-14. Third it would be nice to know that C-14 is constantly created in the upper atmosphere by cosmic rays and variation is caused by changes in the amount of cosmic rays and how strongly they are deflected by the earth&#039;s magnetic field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state of general science knowledge in America is poor and articles in a magazine like Smithsonian should not have several blatant errors. First radioactive atoms decay not degrade. Second C-14 dating compares to ratio of<br />
C-14 to C-12 not N-14. Third it would be nice to know that C-14 is constantly created in the upper atmosphere by cosmic rays and variation is caused by changes in the amount of cosmic rays and how strongly they are deflected by the earth&#8217;s magnetic field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
