Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


October 31, 2012

Even in Healthy Adults, High-Fat Fast Foods Affect Arteries Almost Immediately

Eating a fatty sandwich for breakfast could impact your cardiovascular health by the afternoon. Image via Flickr user knster

We’re all aware that a eating a high-fat diet over the course of a lifetime increases your chance of developing a number of health problems, including arteriosclerosis, heart disease and colon cancer. Most of us, though, think of this as a long-term process and imagine that an occasional indiscretion—especially if we’re in good shape—isn’t a big problem.

For those with this type of mindset, new research on the immediate effects of consuming an ultra high-fat meal (in this case, a pair of greasy breakfast sandwiches) will be particularly unwelcome. According to research presented yesterday in Toronto at the Canadian Cardiovascular Congress by Vincent Lee of the University of Calgary, the health consequences of eating high-fat foods can become apparent within a matter of hours.

In the study, a group of 20 healthy university students was fed a pair of commercially available breakfast sandwiches (the researchers declined to specify which ones to avoid singling out one chain at the expense of the overall finding) that included processed cheese, egg and ham on a bun and added up to 860 calories, 1,500 milligrams of sodium and 50 grams of fat—roughly as much sodium and fat as an adult is supposed to eat in a day. Although eating two sandwiches might seem like an unusually unhealthy breakfast, consider that a single Sausage Biscuit with Egg at McDonald’s has 33 grams of fat, while some breakfast sandwiches at Burger King have as much as 48 grams of fat.

The students’ arterial health was calculated via velocity time interval (VTI). “VTI tells us how much blood flow you can you get in your arm,” said cardiovascular researcher Todd Anderson, head of the University of Calgary lab where the research was conducted. Specifically, it measures how quickly blood flows back down the arm after a blood pressure cuff has been briefly inflated. In general, a higher VTI number indicates better blood vessel health, reflecting that small vessels can dilate to full capacity quickly and blood vessel signaling hormones are functioning properly.

Just two hours after eating the pair of sandwiches, the students’ blood vessels already showed the ill effects of the high-fat meal. Their VTI numbers were 15 to 20 percent lower than on other days when they hadn’t eaten any breakfast. Although the effect was temporary—the students’ VTI numbers returned to normal over the course of the day—it still demonstrates the fact that high-fat foods can do more harm, more quickly, than researchers had previously assumed.

“The real question is: what’s this doing to blood vessels over a period of time?” Anderson said. “Previously, our lab has shown that this VTI measurement, in a group of 400 middle-aged men studied for a decade, was associated with heart attack or stroke, so we think it’s a good barometer of blood vessel health.” Over the course of decades, reduced blood flow in these types of small blood vessels can cause plaque and cholesterol to build up.

Although previous research has shown that high-fat foods can have an acute impact on larger blood vessels, this research was the first to show a similar immediate effect on small blood vessels, which Anderson’s lab believes are more pivotal in overall cardiovascular health. Additionally, he said, “the fact that we saw a statistically significant decrease in healthy individuals was a bit of a surprise. If we had studied people at risk of diabetes or obese individuals, with an abnormal metabolism, it would have been more expected.”

For Anderson, the findings have less to do with breakfast sandwiches, per se, and more to do with overall health choices. “The message is that, even in young healthy individuals, dietary indiscretions are unhealthy behaviors,” he said. “Within two hours of doing something bad, you can acutely impair blood vessel function in a vascular bed that we think is important for overall vascular health.”

So, if just one high-fat breakfast leads to reduced blood vessel health, is it a good idea to ever eat these kinds of foods? “I won’t say don’t ever have a breakfast sandwich, but individuals have to show good judgment,” Anderson said. “Even one episode of eating something unhealthy can have an effect. Think before you eat.”



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

15 Comments »

  1. dodny says:

    and now for something completely different:

    Anthony Colpo – Anthony Colpo Blog, The Fat Loss Bible

    Mark Sisson – Mark’s Daily Apple, The Primal Blueprint

    Robb Wolf – Robb Wolf Blog, The Paleo Solution

    Kurt Harris – Archevore

    Stephan Guyenet – Whole Health Source

    Chris Kresser – Beyond Paleo

    Chris Masterjohn – The Daily Lipid

    Paul and Schou-Ching Shih Jaminet – Perfect Health Diet

    J. Stanton – Gnolls

  2. Blake S. says:

    There are a few problems with this. First, it is NOT very well established that a high fat diet increases your chances of those unsavory ailments you mention. Although the studies may show that high fat diets are associated with increases in such things, it’s ambiguous, at best, whether the high fat part of the diet actually cause any of those problems.

    Second, it’s almost impossible to draw conclusions about the impact a high fat breakfast has on the body without controlling for carbs. It’s been known for years now that the body reacts differently when carbs are kept below certain levels. For example, it’s known that many of the risk factors for the ailments mentioned in this post decrease when carbs are removed from a person’s diet and replaced with fat.

    Of all the links posted, I can’t find one for the actual study, so it’s difficult to know if they actually controlled for carb content. Unlikely if all that is mentioned in this post is breakfast sandwiches. If I had to bet, after not seeing the study, I’d give five to one odds that the conclusions drawn in this blog post and/or study, as they relate to fat content, are insupportable by the study.

  3. E Brodie says:

    Not finding the actual study, I would like to have seen what the controls were. Did they have another group eating a low fat breakfast item, and test their VTI? We may already know something about general harmful effects of high fat diets, but the dramatic (sensational) element in this study is the proposal that a high fat breakfast uniquely produces such a sudden effect. But they weren’t actually measuring arterial plaque; just a blood vessel dynamic that otherwise is known to be affected by plaque or blood vessel wall changes. (did they also do duplex ultrasound or other diagnostic of blood vessels?)
    I am prompted to wonder if eating ANY meal, low or high fat, isn’t normally a regular cause of VTI changes in a ~ 20 minute window. Something like a blood shunting dynamic from the onset of a digestion event, causing hemodynamic changes in the periphery…

  4. GQ says:

    This article is so flawed. First of all, it ASSUMES that “a higher VTI number indicates better blood vessel health.” Really? At any one time, all day long, even after meals? It only monitor VTI as a sole indicator of good health. Really? Our body is more complex than that. Were they monitor anything else? We have 5 senses, and many organs, and zillions of cells. Did anything good come out of eating such a meal? None? If not, why so many people eat them? Did they look at any other variables? If they didn’t, then they should NOT make a conclusion based on one single factor and one single indicator.

  5. Donald Bons says:

    “Their VTI numbers were 15 to 20 percent lower than on other days when they hadn’t eaten any breakfast.”…

    This is a poorly written article. According to this sentence, the cause could be eating in general. I see no comparisons to any other alternatives such as a breakfast of oatmeal. There is are no references, and this does not appear to have been a double blind study. Bad science!! All of this makes this article unreliable at best.

  6. Julie says:

    Studies like these are so maddening. Calling a fast-food, super processed breakfast sandwich simply a “high-fat food”. There are several other macronutrients in that sandwich. The nature and source of the fat isn’t in question.

    So yeah, what commenter dodny said.

  7. Kent Bostock says:

    NICE photo but I’ll bet its the wheat in the bread that is causing problems for America -not the Yummy stuff in between.
    Its looking more like dwarf wheat, that the food industry has adopted as its number one “across the board” choice (for its cheap price)-is the problem specifically. Untested designer grains(high yield, drought & insect resistant) are great for cash flow, but feeding us a grain mutation unsuitable for long-term human health is raising its ugly head of consequences.

    Dwarf Wheat -the secret triple whammy -Super Carbs, Super Gluten, super addictive (amylopectin A)- May well be the public warning you’ll be putting out there, once you shake loose of the hypnotic chant from the 80s… “All whole grains are all so good (for you)”

    Get off the wheat pipe, and get on the stick. Folks need relevant, accurate and updated input, not recycled rhetoric from three decades ago.

    Now go try it again.

    Kent the Zen Master -Buffalo,NY

  8. Jane says:

    Wait, where’s the control? Was there a group that ate a low-fat breakfast and didn’t show a change in blood flow? Is this just an effect of blood getting diverted to digestion, or of people moving differently when very full, or of large amounts of sodium?

  9. Mark J says:

    The article states, “Their VTI numbers were 15 to 20 percent lower than on other days when they hadn’t eaten any breakfast.” Therefore, all this proves to me is that eating anything lowers your VTI numbers. Perhaps they would like to suggest we stop eating?

    I would be more interested in the results of this study if they compared VTI numbers after eating various foods for breakfast. Until they do that, I believe their results are meaningless.

  10. Jennifer says:

    Hi.
    You know what would be REALLY SURPRISING. Uncovering the SCIENTIFIC LIES ON SATURATED FAT. This is slowly coming to light by several REAL SCIENTISTS WHO ARE NOT BOUND BY POLITICS AND LOBBYISTS. Please look into this, and please publish what you find, if you have any integrity at all. This article is old school, time to go NEW SCHOOL.

  11. GogogoStopSTOP says:

    There are no studies. There are no measurements. The Smithsonian article… IF YOU CAN BELIEVE THEY WOULD PUBLISH THIS TRIPE, SAYS”

    “The students’ arterial health was calculated”. THEIR HEALT WAS CALCULATED!? Calculated!!!???

    Is there anyone on the editorial staff with half a brain, a scientific degree… OR JUST OL’ COMMON SENSE????

    THEIR HEALT WAS CALCULATED!? Give me a break!

  12. JoAnne Simson says:

    “days when they hadn’t eaten any breakfast.” is NO kind of control for a high-fat breakfast. Perhaps a breakfast of equivalent weight, or equivalent calories might be considered an appropriate control, but no breakfast is definitely NOT a control. After eating, blood vessels in the viscera relax (for more blood flow) and those in the periphery (such as the arm, DUH), constrict so that the blood flow is lowered and available to the G.I. tract. So of course blood flow to the arm was decreased. Was this a high-school science project?

  13. Barbara says:

    Reference to “high school science project” is slander.
    Science projects in high school are generally worthwhile
    and worked through carefully.

  14. Mike says:

    I believe this is the link to the abstract:
    http://www.onlinecjc.ca/article/S0828-282X(12)01034-3/fulltext

    You can also get a PDF from that site.

    I haven’t read the paper yet, but I wanted to share the resource so that everyone can get into it right away.

  15. GoodStew says:

    I saw it’s “the bun’s” fault ;-)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement