October 4, 2012
New Project Aims to Drill to the Earth’s Mantle, 3.7 Miles Down
![]()

Tungsten carbide drill bits will grind through miles of ultra-hard igneous seafloor rock in hopes of reaching the mantle. Image via IODP
One of the strangest facets of modern exploration is that we now have more experience with the surface of Mars than the layer of earth not too far beneath our feet. Nearly everything we know about the mantle—the 1,800-mile-thick semi-molten layer of the planet below the crust—comes indirectly: from computer simulations, mantle-derived rocks that made their way to the surface and observation of earthquake waves that move through the mantle.
The international group of scientists that makes up the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP), though, hopes that will soon change. As part of a new project, they are planning to drill some 3.7 miles down into the earth beneath the Pacific Ocean to reach the mantle—and bring up samples of mantle rock for the first time in human history. Damon Teagle, a geochemist at the University of Southampton in England and one of the project’s leaders, told CNN that it will be “the most challenging endeavor in the history of earth science.”
The first effort to drill through the crust to the mantle, Project Mohole, reached 600 feet below the sea floor off Mexico before being abandoned in 1966. Subsequent attempts have gone increasingly deeper, and on September 6, the IODP’s drilling vessel, the Chikyu, set a world record by drilling almost 7,000 feet below the seafloor off Japan and bringing up rock samples.

The drilling vessel Chikyu, pictured off the coast of Japan, will be used to drill down to the mantle. Image via IODP
The ambitious new project aims to go nearly three times as deep. IODP scientists have selected three different sites in the Pacific where the crust is thinnest–it was formed relatively quickly at spreading mid-ocean ridges, where new crust crystallizes as the plates move apart. Although drilling from a floating ship out at sea presents many difficulties, going through the oceanic plates that make up the seafloor is a much easier way of getting to the mantle than trying to drill through the continental plates—the ocean crust ranges from four to six miles thick, whereas the continents go 20 to 30 miles down.
Still, penetrating the oceanic crust will be an unprecedented challenge. The project will cost at least $1 billion, some of which still needs to be raised, and drilling will likely take years. The equipment will be lowered down through more than a mile of water, and the stress that the tungsten carbide drill bits encounter as they grind through hard igneous seafloor rock requires that each bit needs to be replaced after just 50 to 60 hours of use.

Due to the stress of penetrating seafloor rock, drill bits will have to be replaced after just 50 to 60 hours of use. Image via IODP
The extreme narrowness of the hole itself (just 11 inches wide) also increases the difficulty of the operation. “It will be the equivalent of dangling a steel string the width of a human hair in the deep end of a swimming pool and inserting it into a thimble 1/10 mm wide on the bottom, and then drilling a few meters into the foundations,” Teagle said.
As the drill descends, the team will repeatedly retrieve rock cores roughly three inches across and 30 feet long for scientists to study. If the mission is successful in reaching all the way to the mantle, the scientific payoff will be significant, as samples of mantle rock will help geologists better understand the layer that makes up more than 84 percent of the planet’s volume. “[The mantle] is the engine that drives how our planet works and why we have earthquakes and volcanoes and continents,” Teagle said. “We have the textbook cartoons, but detailed knowledge is lacking.”
For Teagle and others, the mission also represents the kind of ambitious, grand project that can inspire generations of young people to get involved in science—like NASA’s Apollo missions and the more recent Curiosity rover. Teagle says that successfully reaching the mantle would be revolutionary and that it will leave a new “legacy of fundamental scientific knowledge.”
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
























the IODP’s drilling vessel, the Chikyu, set a world record by drilling almost 7,000 feet below the seafloor off Japan and bringing up rock samples
That’s not as impressive as it sounds. In the Gulf of Mexico, oil companies have been drilling much deeper than that for decades. In 200, the Deepwater Horizon drilled to 35,050 ft or five times deeper than the IODP.
Sadly, the scientific community has refused to learn from the oil industry (witness the ORION program’s insistence on developing new platforms instead of using industry standard ones that would have cut costs by a factor of ten).
The objective of this project is to acquire samples, via cores, near the mantle. As stated, the engineering is designed to drill through as little crust as possible. None of the wells drilled in the Gulf of Mexico come anywhere near the mantle.
It would be nice if Exxon, Shell, BP, etc. would proactively donate funds, equipment and engineering expertise to the project, if they already haven’t.
won’t the samples they get from the mantle be identical to the magma you can get from volcanoes?
Sparcboy, though none of the commercial wells in the Gulf of Mexico have deliberately drilled into the mantle, the physics of drilling doesn’t change. The reason that they are avoiding the crust is in order to get mantle material that is as recent as possible.
And why should the oil companies donate materials if their methods (which would be far more valuable as they will save time, materials, and money) are ignored?
Mihai, the samples of mantle material will probably be different than what is obtained from volcanoes. Most volcanoes are sourced from deeper in the mantle and the magma undergoes differentiation on the way up. This will be an opportunity to see what the mantle is like near the mantle-lithosphere boundary.
John, it seems the most recent mantle material would be that being exuded at a mid-oceanic ridge, a process captured on film. In a brief search of the web, I could not find any details explaining the need to drill for mantle material as opposed to collecting it at a mid-oceanic ridge. As you seem to be more knowledgeable on this subject, a link would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Sparcboy, it is my understanding that the main reason for drilling away from the mid-ocean ridge has little to do with the mantle and much to do with the technology. It is very difficult to drill into a hard material, such as basalt. The drill is likely to slip and the hole will make very little progress; anyone who has ever tried to drill a hole into a ceramic tile will understand the problem. The drilling program is trying to do that in the dark by remote control.
By moving away from the ridge to a location with a modicum of sediment, they are able to establish a hole where the drilling is (relatively) easy and can use that to stabilize drilling as they go deeper. In addition, this moves the drilling away from the region of most intense hydrothermal flow, which reduces the possibility of a fluid-induced blowout or hole loss.
So the drillers are balancing the need for recent mantle material against the need for an operation that is safe and lower cost.
I’m sorry – I forgot to provide a link for the IODP’s workshop into the questions that sparcboy raises:
http://campanian.iodp.org/MantleFrontier/0_Reaching_the_Mantle_Frontier_Workshop_Report.pdf