Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


November 16, 2012

A Wandering “Homeless” Planet is Spotted in Deep Space

An artist’s rendering of CFBDSIR2149, as viewed through an infrared filter. Image via L. Calçada, P. Delorme, Nick Risinger, R. Saito, European Southern Observatory/VVV Consortium

The astronomy world is abuzz over the discovery of an exoplanet in a nearly unprecedented situation: It’s the first observed to be hurtling through space on its own, rather than orbiting a star. The find, reported by researchers from the University of Montreal in a paper published Wednesday in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, is roughly 100 light-years away and has been labelled CFBDSIR2149.

“Although theorists had established the existence of this type of very cold and young planet, one had never been observed until today,” Étienne Artigau, an astrophysicist at the University of Montreal, said in a statement. Over the past decade, astronomers have spotted several candidate objects that could potentially qualify as drifting planets, but the line between what is called a “planet” and what is called a “star” is fuzzy, especially when observing from a distance. Through a telescope, it’s hard to differentiate whether a small solitary object is a “homeless” planet (as the researchers have termed this one) or a brown dwarf, the smallest type of star. The researchers concluded that this is a planet, and one that is 50 to 120 million years old and about 400 degrees Celsius in temperature.

Because this object appears to be traveling through space along with a diffuse group of roughly 30 associated stars called the AB Doradus Moving Group (but does not orbit any of them), the astronomers were able to work out several more pieces of information about it, such as its age, mass and temperature, based on the assumption that the planet likely shares an origin with the rest of the stars in the group. Objects must be less than 13 times the mass of Jupiter to be considered a planet, rather than a brown dwarf, and this object appears to have a mass between four and seven times that of Jupiter, making it an unqualified, starless planet, the first of its kind.

Scientists have speculated that this type of object could result from a normal planet being flung out of its solar system, or could form alone in its present state. Theories of planet and star formation imply that there might be an extremely high number of such solitary planets—they might be as common as normal stars.

For astronomers, the problem is seeing them. Unlike stars, these objects don’t emit a large amount of light. This planet was detected using data from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, located on the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii, with further details worked out using the ESO’s Very Large Telescope in northern Chile. Using infrared images from both telescopes, the research team was able to pick out the slight amount of light emanating from the planet, even though it is clearly outshined by the brighter stars:

The pale blue dot at the exact center of this infrared telescope image is the newly discovered “homeless” planet. Image via P. Delorme, European Southern Observatory

This image might seem extremely faint, but compared to most exoplanets—which are typically spotted only when they cross in front of the star they orbit or known from how they make their star wobble—astronomers can see this planet much more clearly because there is no competing starlight in the immediate vicinity. “Looking for planets around their stars is akin to studying a firefly sitting one centimeter away from a distant, powerful car headlight,” Philippe Delorme, the lead author of the study, said in a statement. “This nearby free-floating object offered the opportunity to study the firefly in detail without the dazzling lights of the car messing everything up.”

The researchers say that free-floating planets like this one are scientifically significant beyond their apparent uniqueness. “These objects are important, as they can either help us understand more about how planets may be ejected from planetary systems, or how very light objects can arise from the star formation process,” Delorme said. “If this little object is a planet that has been ejected from its native system, it conjures up the striking image of orphaned worlds, drifting in the emptiness of space.”



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

18 Comments »

  1. I. B'stiel says:

    Much like new medical imaging equipment allow us to see what we previuosly only saw after something died. Very exciting!!! Discovering we have more than our egotisitical flat line.

  2. Patrick says:

    How did it get to be 400 degrees C?

    What produces the heat?

  3. Richard Anderson says:

    I hope it doesn’t turn out to be Darth Vadar’s Death Star.

  4. Jim Rushton says:

    Everyone is looking for heaven or hell….could this be it! At 400 deg C, I suppose “hell” is likely!

  5. M.K. Hajdin says:

    Rogue planets aren’t unique. The universe is full of them. They’re just hard to see because they don’t give off much light.

  6. M.K. Hajdin says:

    Also, brown dwarfs aren’t stars. They’re classified as sub-stellar objects.

  7. Mark Antosz says:

    “That’s not a moon – it’s a space station!”

  8. Gary Allen says:

    Makes you wonder what else is out in space that we have not yet discovered

  9. Fred says:

    Like all bodies in space they start as collided and very hot and somewhat radioactive rock.

    They probably were partly or entirely molten.

    After an eon or two of cooling down and reheating due to radioactive decay, they have arrived at a temperature that enables them to be detected and measured by an infrared or radio telescope.

    It is even possible they may contain some life forms from times before they were ejected from their solar systems.

  10. Mike says:

    Interesting! I hope that everyone’s Sunday is going great and safe, and I also hop that they had a nice Veteran’s Day. That goes for lastyear and all the other years that I’ve missed.

  11. Mike says:

    I meant “hope” and “last year” in my previous post. I apologize for my mistake.

  12. Temperature is given as Celcius not Centigrade. Reading would be different as to hot or cold. Have not done a conversion lately so don’t know the Centigrade temperature of the Planet myself. Will determine this later….when I get some free time to look up the formula.

  13. Bill Hodges says:

    A “homeless” planet? I guess that means some politicians will be wanting to adopt it and send it welfare checks and food stamps!

  14. patrick says:

    It is a facimile of the DESTROYER, planet x !

  15. patrick says:

    It is facimile of planet X the Destroyer

  16. John says:

    That’s no homeless planet. That’s a space station!

  17. Kyle says:

    @Patrick,

    Even though we think of the atmosphere here as empty space, formless, and weightless, the atmosphere actually does have weight and as it piles down to the surface from the influence of gravity it heats up. This explains why it is colder as you increase elevation (like going to the mountains) and its warmer at the surface, at least in the troposphere.

    The pressure from massive amounts of gasses is apparent in Jupiter, our sun, and which gas laws can certainly explain as to why this planet is 400 degrees C. Jupiter is more than 300 times the mass of Earth, so you can imagine how much hotter temperatures are on the “surface” of Jupiter compared to our cozy little planet.

    If this “homeless” planet is 13 times the mass of Jupiter, its temperature would be very, very great because temperature is proportional to volume and pressure. We must also factor in gravity, which would be that much stronger on a planet of this magnitude based solely on how massive in size this stellar object is. Yet even still, this “wandering star” has no comparison to the average temperature on the surface of our sun: 5,726 degrees Celsius.

  18. BLegg says:

    The article didn’t say but I’m going to assume this is a gas giant if it’s 4-7 x’s as large as Jupiter. And at that size I suppose it’s own gravity is causing the 400 degree temperature.

    I’m interested to learn how it formed. If it was ejected from a solar system or possibly was on it’s way to becoming a start itself and simply ran out of fuel. We tend to think of planets as being gathered remains of dust and rock circling a star over time, but to have one form with no star present really makes you think about the possibilities.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement