Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


December 31, 2012

Does Deep Space Travel Cause Alzheimer’s?

The levels of radiation astronauts experience over the course of an extended mission in deep space could lead to dementia and Alzheimer’s. Image via NASA.

NASA has big plans for manned travel in deep space. Although missions haven’t been officially announced yet, experts speculate that the agency plans to establish a space station on the far side of the moon sometime in the next decade, a stepping stone towards landing on an asteroid in 2025 and potentially trying to reach Mars sometime around 2033.

Getting to Mars, though, would require astronauts to endure a round-trip (or possibly one-way) journey that could be as long as three years—which could be particularly worrisome given the results of a study on the health effects of cosmic radiation published today in PLOS ONEAlthough we’ve known for some time that the radiation experienced by space travelers could pose problems over the long term, this new study is the first to establish a link with an increased chance of Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.

The researchers, a group from NASA and the University of Rochester, came to the finding by testing a specific type of cosmic radiation—high-mass, high-charged (HZE) iron particles—on mice. This kind of radiation is of particular concern, because its high speed (a result of the force of the exploding stars it’s originally expelled from, light-years away) and large mass mean that it’s tricky to protect against.

Here on Earth, we’re largely protected from it and other types of radiation by our planet’s atmosphere and magnetic field, but even a short time in deep space means much higher levels of exposure, and we haven’t yet figured out how to construct a shield that effectively blocks it. ”Because iron particles pack a bigger wallop it is extremely difficult from an engineering perspective to effectively shield against them,” M. Kerry O’Banion, the paper’s senior author, said in a statement. “One would have to essentially wrap a spacecraft in a six-foot block of lead or concrete.”

After producing radioactive particles that generate this type of radiation using a particle accelerator at the Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island, the researchers exposed the mice to varying doses of the radiation, including levels comprable to what astronauts would experience on a mission to Mars. The breed of mice they used has been the subject of numerous studies on dementia and Alzheimer’s, so scientists have a relatively good understanding of how rapidly the disease and related symptoms develop over time.

But when the researchers put the mice through a series of behavioral tests—seeing if they were capable of remembering objects or specific locations—those that had been exposed to greater levels of radiation were far more likely to fail, demonstrating signs of neurological impairment far more early in life than is typical in the breed. Additionally, autopsies of these mice revealed that their brains contained higher levels of beta amyloid, the “plaque” considered a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease.

This result doesn’t mean we have to abandon dreams of deep space travel—or even that this kind of radiation definitively leads to accelerated neurological degeneration—but it does show that cosmic radiation is going to be a graver concern the longer space missions get. Ingenious engineering has addressed many of the difficulties of space flight, but this remains a problem to be solved.

“These findings clearly suggest that exposure to radiation in space has the potential to accelerate the development of Alzheimer’s disease,” O’Banion said. “This is yet another factor that NASA, which is clearly concerned about the health risks to its astronauts, will need to take into account as it plans future missions.”



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

4 Comments »

  1. Bandraite says:

    Interesting. If the Earth has managed for billions of years, duplicating our protection shouldn’t be too difficult given the technology around. Creating a magnetic field is required, and that is already well in hand. The other protection we have is our atmosphere. Creating a double hull or at least a double skin environment for living and working – filled with the gases that make up ‘air’ shouldn’t be difficult. Voila, you have protection similar to Earth.

  2. Steve says:

    It seems unlikely that such a relatively minor concern will stand in the way of getting people to mars. After all the effort that has been invested into developing the space travel technology, surely it should just be a formality to find a solution to this.

  3. Vyctorya says:

    I found this article to be interesting. I understand that, in some cases, there are differences between boys/men and girls/wymin in the experience of mental illness. Does the study mentioned in this article account for those differences? In other words, would the mental effects of space travel be the same or different for men and wymin?

  4. George Gleason says:

    Practical and achievable solution:

    The entire problem of appropriately shielding a space station or vehicle translates to the cost of lifting the mass of the shielding material out of a gravity well (as compared to lifting the much lower mass of comparable but un-shielded systems).

    The next-generation space station and Mars vehicles should have double-hull construction. The space between the hulls would be filled with mass lifted from the Moon: a mixture of lunar rock, sand, and dust in proportions calculated to achieve maximum practical density per cubic meter. This would provide the “six feet of concrete” needed for effective shielding.

    The space station and Mars vehicles, minus their shielding ballast, could be built on Earth or on a lunar base. They would be launched to an appropriate “parking” location in orbit around the Moon, where they would remain while being filled with the lunar ballast mixture. The ballast would be delivered by a fleet of robotic vehicles that would each make multiple round trips until the task was complete.

    There would of course be an additional fuel cost for accelerating the higher mass of the completed space station and Mars vehicles to their working velocities en-route to their respective destinations. However the extreme cost of lifting that mass from Earth, would have been traded off for the much lower cost of lifting the ballast from the Moon. The additional costs of the common infrastructure such as the Moon base and fleet of ballast delivery vehicles, would be spread out over many missions over many decades.

    All of this is entirely possible within the scope of existing science, with only some modest and easily-achieved improvements in technology.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement