<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pick Your Poison: A Diet Mixer Could Make You Get Drunk Faster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/</link>
	<description>Ideas, innovations and discoveries from the world of science</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:17:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Epidemiologist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-10731</link>
		<dc:creator>Epidemiologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=14715#comment-10731</guid>
		<description>1) Very small sample size, split into two groups that can&#039;t be compared with each other. 2)What did they control for? Confounders: race, ethnicity, tolerance, body fat percentage, height, etc. I don&#039;t see them controlling for any of these. 3) We have no p-values or confidence intervals reported. Again, such a small sample size means the difference could more easily be due to pure chance. 4) The list goes on. I wouldn&#039;t expect something with the name Smithsonian to print something so ridiculous and unscientifically rigorous. At least acknowledge the study&#039;s monumental shortcomings before you tout this crap as fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Very small sample size, split into two groups that can&#8217;t be compared with each other. 2)What did they control for? Confounders: race, ethnicity, tolerance, body fat percentage, height, etc. I don&#8217;t see them controlling for any of these. 3) We have no p-values or confidence intervals reported. Again, such a small sample size means the difference could more easily be due to pure chance. 4) The list goes on. I wouldn&#8217;t expect something with the name Smithsonian to print something so ridiculous and unscientifically rigorous. At least acknowledge the study&#8217;s monumental shortcomings before you tout this crap as fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-10724</link>
		<dc:creator>John Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=14715#comment-10724</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t 4.2oz (4-1/4 shots) of vodka put anyone over the legal standard of .08? Unless they waited three hours or took the tests within approx 5 mins?
Also I would like to see the actual BAC&#039;s (Not BrAC&#039;s) in comparison. Perhaps there is a chemical in the sugar-free sodas which expedite the metabolism and respiration of alcohol. 
Finally, is there any data on the drinking experience (re: perceived tolerance) for the data collected regarding &quot;subjective ratings including feelings of intoxication, impairment, and willingness to drive&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t 4.2oz (4-1/4 shots) of vodka put anyone over the legal standard of .08? Unless they waited three hours or took the tests within approx 5 mins?<br />
Also I would like to see the actual BAC&#8217;s (Not BrAC&#8217;s) in comparison. Perhaps there is a chemical in the sugar-free sodas which expedite the metabolism and respiration of alcohol.<br />
Finally, is there any data on the drinking experience (re: perceived tolerance) for the data collected regarding &#8220;subjective ratings including feelings of intoxication, impairment, and willingness to drive&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canopy tent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-8987</link>
		<dc:creator>canopy tent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=14715#comment-8987</guid>
		<description>I believe the risks associated with drinking can be reduced by greater attention to mixers, particularly diet colas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the risks associated with drinking can be reduced by greater attention to mixers, particularly diet colas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandyra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-8849</link>
		<dc:creator>sandyra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=14715#comment-8849</guid>
		<description>Those diet drinks have phenyalanine (nutrasweet) for the sweetener. Would it be the same if you used a diet drink sweetened with Splenda (sucralose)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those diet drinks have phenyalanine (nutrasweet) for the sweetener. Would it be the same if you used a diet drink sweetened with Splenda (sucralose)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick DeBay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-8824</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick DeBay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=14715#comment-8824</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d hazard that it&#039;s the fructose sweetener in regular soda increasing alcohol metabolism, rather than the diet drink slowing metabolism or speeding uptake:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1854373
The effect of fructose on alcohol metabolism and on the [lactate]/[pyruvate] ratio in man
&quot;The mean rate of alcohol metabolism increased by 80% after fructose...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d hazard that it&#8217;s the fructose sweetener in regular soda increasing alcohol metabolism, rather than the diet drink slowing metabolism or speeding uptake:<br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1854373" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1854373</a><br />
The effect of fructose on alcohol metabolism and on the [lactate]/[pyruvate] ratio in man<br />
&#8220;The mean rate of alcohol metabolism increased by 80% after fructose&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hartman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/2013/02/pick-your-poison-a-diet-mixer-could-make-you-get-drunk-faster/comment-page-1/#comment-8814</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hartman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/science/?p=14715#comment-8814</guid>
		<description>Money saving tip - save 20% on liquor by using diet soda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money saving tip &#8211; save 20% on liquor by using diet soda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
