<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bra Is 500 Years Older Than We Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/07/the-bra-is-500-years-older-than-we-thought/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/07/the-bra-is-500-years-older-than-we-thought/</link>
	<description>Keeping You Current</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:02:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/07/the-bra-is-500-years-older-than-we-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/?p=1450#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...I don&#039;t think it said the suitor was male.  :)  I think this is a really cool find.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;I don&#8217;t think it said the suitor was male.  <img src='http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think this is a really cool find.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen M</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/07/the-bra-is-500-years-older-than-we-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/?p=1450#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Actually I think the &quot;idea&quot; of a bra or a restraining device is probably older then that. I can see women maybe binding them selves at certain time. Maybe hunting so running is more comfortable. Using some hide or such. Just because it dosen&#039;t have satin or lace dosen&#039;t make it out of the running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think the &#8220;idea&#8221; of a bra or a restraining device is probably older then that. I can see women maybe binding them selves at certain time. Maybe hunting so running is more comfortable. Using some hide or such. Just because it dosen&#8217;t have satin or lace dosen&#8217;t make it out of the running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/07/the-bra-is-500-years-older-than-we-thought/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/?p=1450#comment-188</guid>
		<description>&quot;Suggesting they were also meant to please a suitor&quot;? 

I generally don&#039;t buy bras with lace and ornamentation to &quot;please&quot; suitors. I buy them because I think they&#039;re pretty and because I like them. I&#039;m not saying that the women 600 years ago felt like me, however, quite frankly, we don&#039;t know if they didn&#039;t. I find it interesting, that when faced with a lack of clear evidence to the reason behind the decoration, instead of choosing a woman centered explanation about a woman issue, they&#039;ve choosen a man centered explanation of a woman issue. A woman could not independently decide she like lace, in this explanation, she has to be consumed with what a man thought of her undergarment and choose it accordingly. Essentially, the explanation given in this paragraph is extremely disempowering to women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Suggesting they were also meant to please a suitor&#8221;? </p>
<p>I generally don&#8217;t buy bras with lace and ornamentation to &#8220;please&#8221; suitors. I buy them because I think they&#8217;re pretty and because I like them. I&#8217;m not saying that the women 600 years ago felt like me, however, quite frankly, we don&#8217;t know if they didn&#8217;t. I find it interesting, that when faced with a lack of clear evidence to the reason behind the decoration, instead of choosing a woman centered explanation about a woman issue, they&#8217;ve choosen a man centered explanation of a woman issue. A woman could not independently decide she like lace, in this explanation, she has to be consumed with what a man thought of her undergarment and choose it accordingly. Essentially, the explanation given in this paragraph is extremely disempowering to women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
