<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomers Find More Than 1,500,000 New Black Holes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/08/astronomers-find-more-than-1500000-new-black-holes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/08/astronomers-find-more-than-1500000-new-black-holes/</link>
	<description>Keeping You Current</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/08/astronomers-find-more-than-1500000-new-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-585</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/?p=3408#comment-585</guid>
		<description>Second question: are black holes considered matter, dark matter, or dark energy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second question: are black holes considered matter, dark matter, or dark energy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Schultz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/08/astronomers-find-more-than-1500000-new-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/?p=3408#comment-583</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m certainly no expert on this subject, but I would suspect that comes down to whether this observation conflicts with theoretical predictions on the number of black holes in the universe. My hunch is that theoreticians always suspected there were more black holes than we could see, but knowing how well they align would be interesting for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m certainly no expert on this subject, but I would suspect that comes down to whether this observation conflicts with theoretical predictions on the number of black holes in the universe. My hunch is that theoreticians always suspected there were more black holes than we could see, but knowing how well they align would be interesting for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/2012/08/astronomers-find-more-than-1500000-new-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-582</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/smartnews/?p=3408#comment-582</guid>
		<description>So does this discovery alter the matter, dark matter, dark energy configuration (est 5%, 25%, 70% respectively)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does this discovery alter the matter, dark matter, dark energy configuration (est 5%, 25%, 70% respectively)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
