Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


October 26, 2012 2:22 pm

In Honor of Wikipedia’s Near-Completion, Here Are Its Most Awesomely Weird Entries

This man is ghost riding. Wikipedia says so. Image: Yonkeltron

Wikipedia, the encyclopedia for and by the internet, might just be done: Many of the main articles that the encyclopedia might possibly contain, from history to math and science, are almost complete. The Atlantic writes:

It may seem impossible for an encyclopedia of everything to ever near completion, but at least for the major articles on topics like big wars, important historical figures, central scientific concepts, the English-language Wikipedia’s pretty well filled out. (There is, of course, room for improvement in articles that have received less attention, but that is a different, yet still very important, set of challenges.) There’s always going to be some tidying — better citations, small updates, new links, cleaner formatting — but the bulk of the work, the actual writing and structuring of the articles, has already been done.

Of course, Wikipedia’s not entirely done. New pages are added every day, for both new events and other odd nooks and crannies of humanity. And there are some pages that will be disputed forever, like the entry on the book Lolita (should Humbert Humbert be referred to as the book’s “hero”?) and the one on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Some entries are being updated as news comes in, like the current entry on the Syrian civil war. When big events happen like the Japan tsunami, and the 2011 Tucson shooting of Gabrielle Giffords, entries pop up immediately.

But for many, the best part of Wikipedia is its extensiveness. Its blanketing of our human experience. There is little that isn’t included, even really weird things. In honor of the weirdness of Wikipedia, here are some of the strangest Wikipedia entries out there.

1. A list of places with fewer than ten residents. This list includes several towns in Canada and towns with names like Mule Barn and Zug Island.

2. The world’s littlest skyscraper — which is in Wichita Falls, Texas, and is really just a regular sized building.

3. The Pope Lick Monster is a part-man, part-goat, part-sheep (they’re not specific about which parts) that haunts a bridge in Louisville, Kentucky.

4. Lists of lists of lists. Yes, this is a thing, and it’s exactly what it sounds like.

5. Mike the Headless Chicken lived for 18 months without a head. It might have been a hoax. But he’s got his own Wikipedia page, regardless.

6. Three Wolf Moon shirts swept the internet, and real life, around 2008. They have their own entry, explaining the irony and the phenomenon.

7. Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den is a poem consisting of the sound “shi” repeated over and over again. But since there are many different tones used while pronouncing “shi,” to Chinese speakers, the poem makes total sense.

8. Ghost riding—commonly used in the phrase “ghost-riding the whip”—as explained by Wikipedia.

9. YOLO, the current awful catch phrase of young people, means “you only live once” and is generally said before doing something dangerous or stupid.

10. Robert Shields died in 2007, leaving behind a diary of 37.5 million words that chronicled every five minutes of his life.

So, go forth and Wikipedia.

 

More from Smithsonian.com:

How Many Women Does It Take To Change Wikipedia?
Help Illustrate the Internet With Wikipedia’s Photo Contest



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

1 Comment »

  1. Wikipedia is far from complete, regardless of what The Atlantic writes. There are areas of study, such as Asian American studies, the geography of Siberia, the different ethnic groups of Sub-Saharan Africa, and other such articles which have yet to be created, or expanded upon (to at least & class article). There is an entire WikiProject (a group of editors who share a common interest (and possible editing focus)) dedicated to the systematic bias that leads to articles not being created or not improved. That is not to even mention the systematic bias that may deneutralize an article (even if done with the best of intentions of the writer.

    So there is so much more to do, and Wikipedia needs more contributors to replace those who tire out or get to busy in their real lives to continue to make improvements.

    Comment by RightCowLeftCoast — October 27, 2012 @ 6:43 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement