Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


October 25, 2012 11:41 am

Napoleon’s Army May Have Suffered From the Greatest Wardrobe Malfunction in History

200 years ago, Napoleon’s army took on the Russians in the Battle of Maloyaroslavets. Though a French victory, the battle marked a major strategic setback, as the Russians moved to block Napoleon’s path of retreat out of their country. In the end, only 10,000 Frenchmen out of an initial half a million made it out of Russia alive.

Why did this happen? Historians still puzzle over this military catastrophe today, Big Think reports, but a new theory points to an unlikely culprit: the army’s buttons.

Ainissa Ramirez, a materials scientist at Yale University, explains that the bonding structure of tin atoms begins to change when temperatures drop below 56°F, and tin was the major metal used to make buttons in the French army’s uniforms. As the severe Russian temperatures approached -30°C, the buttons may have turned to dust.

In other words, the harsh Russian winter, combined with the chemical properties of tin, may have led to “the greatest wardrobe malfunction in history.”

Here, Ramirez explains the unfortunate gaff, plus some fun facts about tin:

More from Smithsonian.com:

Outsmarting Napoleon 
Chickens Dressed Like Napoleon 



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

2 Comments »

  1. Hello,

    I am really surprise with this. I found dozen of Napoleon I overcoat buttons at Austerlitz or around St Privat/Metz and Laon, all of them are in brass, flat with a number of them. They are the same as the ones used during Napoleon III time (But this time curved) and again during WWI (without number but with the branch of army sign). Around 1915 they change them from brass to iron.
    Perhaps tin has been used for pants or shirts, this I don’t know but never seen for overcoat.

    Arnaud

    Comment by Arnaud — October 30, 2012 @ 11:50 am


  2. This is totally hypothetical. Where is the proof?

    Comment by Glenn Harder — November 6, 2012 @ 6:28 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement