Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


October 10, 2012 4:55 pm

Trial By Judgmental Jury—Attractive Women Seem More Guilty

If you’re planning on committing a crime, try not to be an attractive woman. A recent study suggested that women who are blonde and beautiful are less likely to get any sympathy from a jury.

The Atlantic explains:

Researchers in Spain at the University of Grenada created fictitious scenarios in which a woman was accused of killing her gender-neutral “intimate partner.” In all cases the woman’s story was that she’d been the victim of domestic violence for a long time and had finally killed the person out of self-defense. The only thing different between the narratives was the description of the accused woman.

Here’s what the study found:

The results showed that a defendant perceived as the prototype of a battered woman was judged as having less or no control of the situation; physical attractiveness increased the perception of the defendant´s responsibility in committing the crime; and an interaction between prototypicality and attractiveness in assigning credibility to the defendant´s testimony. Moreover, hostile sexism mediated the relationship between the defendant´s prototypicality and controllability. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for judicial judgement making in cases of battered women who kill their aggressors.

Medical Daily writes:

“One of the most interesting conclusions of the study was that when the woman accused of killing her abuser was attractive, participants attached greater culpability, whereas if considered ‘unattractive’, this decreases,” as explained to SINC by Antonio Herrera, Inmaculada Valor-Segura and Francisca Expósito, the authors of the study published in The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context.

So while the justice system should be blind to these sorts of things, juries are made up of people. And people have biases. So an attractive woman who claims she killed her husband in self defense—say, Susan Lucille Wright, whose defense claimed she killed her husband in self defense, but who was convicted of first degree murder—is less believable to juries than women who aren’t Bond Babes.

More from Smithsonian.com:

The Skinny on the Fatty Arbuckle Trial
Evolution on Trial



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

1 Comment »

  1. >Researchers in Spain at the University of Grenada created fictitious scenarios in which a woman was accused of killing her gender-neutral “intimate partner.”

    I feel like being attractive had them lose out, in this scenario only. Our judgements come down to rationalizing between likely scenarios. In this situation, if the woman is attractive, I think it’s easy for us to rationalize “Oh, she must have killed her partner because she found someone better,” since she is attractive. However, if the situation were something along the lines of theft, I think the results would be different.

    Comment by TamSanh — October 11, 2012 @ 10:30 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement