Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


December 3, 2012 10:11 am

The Pope’s Tweets Are Official Church Doctrine

The pope is officially on Twitter now, under the handle @pontifex, and his tweets are officially “part of the church’s magisterium.” Which means that anything he tweets is the teaching authority of the Catholic Church.

A lot of what the pope says falls into the category of the magesterium, according to the Dogmatic Constitution of the Church of Christ, which says:

…that the Roman Pontiff, when he speaks ex cathedra, that is, when carrying out the duty of the pastor and teacher of all Christians by his supreme apostolic authority he defines a doctrine of faith or morals to be held by the universal Church, through the divine assistance promised him in blessed Peter, operates with that infallibility with which the divine Redeemer wished that His church be instructed in defining doctrine on faith and morals; and so such definitions of the Roman Pontiff from himself, but not from the consensus of the Church, are unalterable.

One reason why the pope’s entry into Twitter is surprising: not that long ago, during his annual message for the World Communications Day, he told everyone on social media to be quiet . He wrote:

The process of communication nowadays is largely fuelled by questions in search of answers. Search engines and social networks have become the starting point of communication for many people who are seeking advice, ideas, information and answers. In our time, the internet is becoming ever more a forum for questions and answers – indeed, people today are frequently bombarded with answers to questions they have never asked and to needs of which they were unaware. If we are to recognize and focus upon the truly important questions, then silence is a precious commodity that enables us to exercise proper discernment in the face of the surcharge of stimuli and data that we receive.

And, in fact, the pope has Tweeted before, saying “Dear Friends, I just launched News.va Praised be our Lord Jesus Christ! With my prayers and blessings, Benedictus XVI.” The pope also has several other social media accounts, like a YouTube channel and a number of Facebook apps.

This time, however, it’s all official. Quartz writes:

The pope will also be tweeting in at least six other languages: German, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Portugese, and Arabic. It’s also been reported he’ll be tweeting in French, but that account does not appear to exist yet, and given that it’s suspended, someone may have already tried to claim it. As in real life, Twitter already has its share of false popes.

So far the pope has around 85,000 followers (of the 1.2 billion Catholics walking the Earth). But the pope won’t be tweeting his own tweets, says Reuters:

Benedict will be pushing the button on his first tweet himself on December 12 but in the future most will be written by aides and he will sign off on them.

But while the pope will be one of the world’s most high-profile tweeters and have many followers, he will not be following anyone himself.

“This is the new market of ideas and the Church has to be there. We want to use any method to spread the message. It’s cost-effective and not very labor intensive and it is aimed at young people,” Burke said.

This is a far cry from how popes used to communicate with the common people: generally, they spoke through the church hierarchy of Bishops. Sometimes the pope would put out a papal bull—a letter that communicated the thoughts of the pope. But they were far longer than 140 characters.

More from Smithsonian.com:

Does Rugby Predict Pope’s Doom?



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

8 Comments »

  1. The Bible is the ONLY official church doctrine. The pope is an unauthorized figure with no support from Scripture. But people still make their own gods.

    Comment by Roger Leonard — December 3, 2012 @ 11:09 am


  2. @Roger Leonard – looks like someone doesn’t know how Catholicism works. There was a college of Cardinals who ordained the Pope. There is official church doctrine spanning centuries which established the Catholic church.

    I’m not sure if you’re making a point about religion in general, or don’t like/understand the Catholic Church’s basic tenants. Either way, your comment is laughable, and I feel like I’m feeding a troll.

    Comment by Stephen — December 3, 2012 @ 4:12 pm


  3. @Stephen As a protestant myself, I am appalled at how many of my bent know absolutely nothing about the workings of the Catholic church. Do I agree with Catholicism? No, but I certainly consider Catholics to be Christians.

    Comment by MM — December 3, 2012 @ 6:32 pm


  4. So… With all due respect… Can I just say that I’m not at all confident that the author of this article actually knows the first thing about Catholicism. I don’t mean to be glib — but… seriously? spend a little time researching the terms “ex cathedra,” “magisterium” (with an “i”), as a start?

    Comment by Molly Maguire (not "MM" above) — December 3, 2012 @ 10:56 pm


  5. I should point out that the Protestants and Catholics have long been waging a war against each other. And, seeing as the original stance is Catholicism=Idolatry, I think you may be in the wrong here.

    Comment by Spiderbait — December 4, 2012 @ 12:18 am


  6. You’re reading the relevant Constitution incorrectly, despite quoting the relevant section. To speak ‘ex cathedra’ the Pope has to say “I, as Bishop of Rome, define…” or words to that effect. This hasn’t really happened much in history, period, and is unlikely to ever happen in a low-context 140-character way.

    You really have an obligation to correct this extremely misleading (which is to say, incorrect) post.

    Comment by Ryan Miller — December 6, 2012 @ 1:08 pm


  7. Hi Ryan,

    Right, so the pope has to define which statements are teachings. But they have said, explicitly, that these Tweets will be just that, so I thought it was relevant to quote that section. The New York Times says “Asked whether the pope’s posts would be infallible, Msgr. Claudio Maria Celli, president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, laughed and said they would be part of the church Magisterium.”

    Rose

    Comment by Rose Eveleth — December 6, 2012 @ 2:40 pm


  8. There is a fundamental misunderstanding here.
    The word “magisterium” means church teaching in general.
    But then you quote a section of a document of the Second Vatican Council which talks about an extraordinary exercise of the church’s teaching authority; namely, an infallible definition specifically about a question of faith or morals.
    Everything a pope writes, his speeches, homilies, public discourses to various groups, is called part of his magisterium or “teaching”, but when he wants to define a doctrinal or moral teaching in a binding way, he won’t do it via Twitter. The article contains a very basic error of fact and it is disturbing to see it presented under the heading of “Smart News.”
    (I have studied Theology)

    Comment by Thomas Buffer — December 7, 2012 @ 7:38 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement