Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


January 16, 2013 9:34 am

Is It Too Late To Forgive Lance Armstrong?

Image: Wikimedia 

Lance Armstrong finally admitted to the long standing accusations of doping. USA TODAY reports:

Lance Armstrong confessed to Oprah Winfrey that he started using performance-enhancing drugs to gain an edge in cycling in the mid-1990s, before he was diagnosed with cancer, a person familiar with the interview told USA TODAY Sports.

Armstrong and his representatives also have had discussions with the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency about meeting soon over several days for a “full debrief,” when Armstrong would be expected to “answer every question, give over records, telephone calls, test results, everything,” the source said.

No one is particularly surprised by this admission, really. Only the most illogical, stalwart fans could stand by the man who beat a field soaked in performance enhancing drugs without also being a user. Not only was Armstrong accused of using EPO, but he also faced charges of threatening teammates both to use and to lie for him.

But while the shock isn’t really there, the debate rages about whether forgiveness will be. Armstrong’s choice to reveal his drug use on Oprah suggests that he wanted to pull at America’s heart strings a little. The Telegraph writes:

Explaining the appeal of ‘telling all’ on Oprah to those not raised in the US is a challenge. If you haven’t seen her story from the beginning – the scrappy woman who managed to turn daytime television upside-down and beat Sally Jesse and Phil Donahue at their own game in the 80s – she might look to the casual observer like just another highly-polished product of American television.

But at home she is far more than that: she is the best friend you never had, the fantasy aunt who always has time to listen to your story, a wellspring of empathy that comes right from her difficult beginnings in Mississippi to become an Oscar nominee for The Color Purple and the first African-American billionaire. She is the American Dream made flesh in the same way of Barack and Michelle Obama, and we love her. Lance Armstrong going on Oprah is an admission that his story needs humanising if he’s to survive the scandal. Or at least, that he thinks it does.

Quartz writes that it isn’t just Armstrong who might find redemption on Oprah’s show:

So the announcement that Winfrey will be conducting Lance Armstrong’s first interview since the cyclist was kicked out of his sport for doping is a much-needed coup for the TV host and media mogul. Armstrong, who is expected to fess up during the Jan. 17 interview, is Winfrey’s first high-profile interview in a while.

But, Oprah or not, is it too late for Lance? The Denver Post says yes:

As I’m writing this Monday morning, Oprah Winfrey may be giving Lance Armstrong a cheesy reassuring tap on the knee as if to say, it’s OK, Lance. I’m still on your side.

I’m not. And neither should you.

CNN’s Jeff Pearlman agrees:

Like Barry Bonds, Lance Armstrong is the last to know where he is headed. We are already beginning to speak of him as we do Alf and Emmanuel Lewis and Small Wonder on one of those “I Love the ’80s” shows. We’ll look back at his cycling reign and shrug, because it will be merely an illusion, an ugly period when people cheated to win, then faced a lifetime of banishment.

Armstrong, he argues, didn’t just lie about doping. He lied about the possibilities of human endurance, of strength and courage. He convinced the world that you could be the best, you could work hard and win in the face of a bunch of cheaters. Here’s Pearlman again:

Across the world, millions of people believe in Armstrong’s narrative. They love his wins, yes, but what drives them and inspires them is the way he faced cancer and battled back from a near-death experience. Young children in pediatric care have been relayed his story, have been told that one day, if you stay strong and fight and believe, you, too, can be just like Lance Armstrong.

And not only did Armstrong shatter that dream, he took down several great cyclists with him. That’s what makes Armstrong different from other dopers, says The Denver Post:

What bothers me most about Armstrong is his history of bullying. It’s what separates him from other disgraced dopers. I remember one passage in Tyler Hamilton’s terrific book, “The Secret Race,” where Armstrong is berating him in an Aspen restaurant for ratting him out on “60 Minutes.”

While Armstrong yelled, “I’m going to make your life a living (bleep) hell” and “We are going to (bleep) tear you apart,” Armstrong never once denied what Hamilton said.

Twitter, of course, had something to say:

Armstrong won’t get his trophies back, but it remains to be seen whether he’ll win any of his former fans. If baseball is any indication, the answer is no.

More from Smithsonian.com:

Report Suggests Armstrong Not Just a Doper But a Pusher
Lance Armstrong Surrenders Against Doping Charges and Will be Banned for Life
Where Lance Remains the King



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

2 Comments »

  1. Lie and doping. Two bad things that a sportsman should have to be far.

    Comment by piyasa kurdu — January 20, 2013 @ 8:36 pm


  2. There are two things that annoy me about this whole thing.

    First, Armstrong was never caught, never tested dirty. How many others that we will never know about, winners and losers both, are out there? There is something inside me that just thinks it’s unfair, even with witnesses and a confession, for him to lose everything with out being caught red handed, so to speak.

    The other is that it really does seem that the USADA really has overstepped its bounds. The Tour de France is not within it’s perview and hounding Armstrong seemed vindictive to me.

    But then again I beleive with the prevalence of performance enhancing drugs, new scientific training regimens, surgeries that improve performance rather than repair damage and that we now have Olympic athletes running with technologically advanced prosthetics, it is perhaps time to usher in a new era of post human sport… Throw it open to enhancements – that is the only way there will ever be an even playing field again.

    Comment by zale — January 26, 2013 @ 11:47 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us



Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement