Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


January 4, 2013 2:12 pm

Physicists Find That “Absolute Zero” May Not Be Quite So Absolute

Physicists don’t tend to use universal language freely, so since Lord Kelvin dubbed the base measure of his temperature scale “absolute zero,” that should be a sign that there is reason for the “absolute” nature of the measure to be taken seriously.

Unlike the centigrade scale, where 0 degrees marks the freezing point of fresh water, or the Fahrenheit scale, where 0 is the stable temperature of a mix of water, ice, ammonium chloride and sea salt, 0 Kelvin—absolute zero—is, theoretically, the coldest thing imaginable. This is the temperature when all motion comes to a crawl, when molecules stop quivering and atoms stop moving.

In Nature, Zeeya Merali reports on the work of Stefan Braun and colleagues, a group of physicists that managed to overthrow Kelvin’s absolutism by creating “an atomic gas with a sub-absolute-zero temperature for the first time.”

Through an elaborate approach—harnessing lasers and rapidly-flipping magnetic fields—the scientists figured out how to push atoms to temporarily take on energies below absolute zero. The scientists manipulated a cloud of potassium atoms trapped by lasers, says Merali:

At positive temperatures, the atoms repel, making the configuration stable. The team then quickly adjusted the magnetic fields, causing the atoms to attract rather than repel each other. “This suddenly shifts the atoms from their most stable, lowest-energy state to the highest possible energy state, before they can react,” says Schneider. “It’s like walking through a valley, then instantly finding yourself on the mountain peak.”

At positive temperatures, such a reversal would be unstable and the atoms would collapse inwards. But the team also adjusted the trapping laser field to make it more energetically favourable for the atoms to stick in their positions. This result, described today in Science, marks the gas’s transition from just above absolute zero to a few billionths of a Kelvin below absolute zero.

Researchers imagine that if new materials could somehow be made out of below-freezing atoms, then they would probably act in some mighty strange ways.

For instance, Rosch and his colleagues have calculated that whereas clouds of atoms would normally be pulled downwards by gravity, if part of the cloud is at a negative absolute temperature, some atoms will move upwards, apparently defying gravity.

Even in physics, it seems, some rules are made to be broken.

More from Smithsonian.com:
The Coldest Place in the Universe
Absolute Zero



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

7 Comments »

  1. I am not convinced.

    Comment by Robert Hale — January 4, 2013 @ 7:04 pm


  2. I expected better of the Smithsonian than to take in such poorly worded journalism without screening. Zero Kelvin is not “absolute zero.” Absolute zero = on energy. Negative temperature means something different than going beyond “absolute zero.” I recommend this reading some comments here so you can re-word this a little:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/15whon/quantum_gas_goes_below_absolute_zero_nature_news/

    No laws of physics have been broken.

    Comment by swany — January 5, 2013 @ 2:41 am


  3. Even easier, a check of the very first paragraph of the wikipedia article on negative temperature tells you what you need to know: negative temperature in physics does not mean colder than 0 Kelvin but hotter than any positive temperature. Fascinating stuff, but it has nothing to do with “absolute zero.”

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_temperature

    Comment by swany — January 5, 2013 @ 2:45 am


  4. This is exciting physics, but please be careful with the terminology.

    The system in the experiment reached a *temperature* below absolute zero, but the average *energy* of the atoms was very high, higher than it would be if they were at any positive temperature.

    Absolute zero still corresponds to the temperature for which the average energy of the atoms is the lowest. It is still “absolute” in that sense.

    Comment by Steven Gardiner — January 5, 2013 @ 4:23 am


  5. Rad.

    Comment by Atticus black — January 5, 2013 @ 6:05 am


  6. There is no absolute MAXIMUM temperature so logic tells me that there can’t possibly be a limit to the MINIMUM temperature.

    Comment by Nissanman — January 6, 2013 @ 6:27 am


  7. Your logic is flawed.

    Comment by Andyc — January 10, 2013 @ 8:13 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement