Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Collage of Arts & Sciences

Where the studio meets the research lab

Design Decoded

Sketching the blueprints behind everyday things

threaded

Your go-to fashion blog for all things historical and sartorial

Retina

The Best Visuals from Smithsonian and the Web


July 23, 2012

Q&A: Archaeologist Unearths 600-year-old Bra in Castle

The bra is a lot older than we thought. Image courtesy of Beatrix Nutz

It was a mere couple of weeks ago on Threaded, on the supposed 66th birthday of the bikini, that I suggested that the two-piece was, in fact, much older—500 years older based on an Italian mosaic in Sicily.

Now, we’re left to ponder another widely held assumption, but this time the undergarment in question is a bra.

Last week, Beatrix Nutz, an archaeologist and researcher at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, shook the foundation, so to speak, in an August 2012 article in BBC History, announcing that she had unearthed four bras and a pair of underwear dating back to the 15th century. Found in an Austrian castle amid dirt, wood, straw and leather, the underpinnings were among more than 2,700 textile fragments excavated in 2008, but the discovery only recently become publicly known.

Particularly jaw-dropping is the discovery of a Middle Ages bra that looks strikingly similar to the modern version patented in the United States in the early 20th century.  Fascinated by the images of her discovery (including a pair of undies, likely worn by men at that time but resembling the panties women don today), I reached out to Nutz to learn more.

Recently discovered 15th-century male underpants resemble modern female underwear

Until now, we thought the bra came along after the corset. Now, in the chronology of foundation garments, it appears that the bra came first, followed by the corset, followed by a version of the brassiere we’re familiar with today. In your opinion, what makes this a particularly worthy discovery?

This find reminds us once more not to believe that we already know everything about our past—there’s always some new/old things to discover.

What does this new timeline tell us about the evolution of women’s apparel?

Evolution sometimes takes a break. The Greek mathematician and geographer Eratosthenes (276 B.C.-195 B.C.) knew our planet was a globe and even calculated its circumference, but throughout the Middle Ages people believed it to be a flat disc.

Bras are certainly not even remotely as important as the actual shape of the earth, but they were obviously invented, went out of fashion, were forgotten, and supposed to be invented (again) in the late 19th century. Now the first invention was rediscovered in Lengberg Castle—that is, until someone finds still older ones somewhere. Never say never.

Lace and other ornamentation were preserved in the bras you discovered, suggesting that this medieval lingerie was likely intended for someone else’s eyes. Were bras a social construct at that time? Why were they worn?

There are some written sources that, although few and far between, provide us with some insight as to the why and who. The French surgeon Henri de Mondeville (1260-1320) reported what women whose breasts were too large did. They “insert two bags in their dresses, adjusted to the breasts, fitting tight, and put them [the breasts] into them [the bags] every morning and fasten them when possible with a matching band.”

To contain and flatten was one reason. This being utilitarian but also for beauty as Mondeville considers too-large breasts to be a disgrace.

An unknown German poet of the 15th century wrote in his satirical poem “Many [a woman] makes two breastbags [bags for the breasts], with them she roams the streets, so that all the young men that look at her, can see her beautiful breasts.”

These women wanted to attract attention by enhancing their breasts. Fashion was already important even back then.

Who typically wore these bras and what do we know about them?

Henri de Mondeville addressed women in general, or at least those that could read at that time, which would only have been members of the upper classes.

Both German authors seem to have referred to burghers, but as the “bras” from East-Tyrol were found in a castle, one can expect the nobility to have worn them as well.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

7 Comments »

  1. Melissa P says:

    “In your opinion, what makes this a particularly worthy discovery?” How about the FRIGGIN’ TIME MACHINE!!! (“Last week, Beatrix Nutz, an archaeologist and researcher at the University of Innsbruck in Austria, shook the foundation, so to speak, in an August 2012 article in BBC History…”

  2. Barbara says:

    I’m confused by the assumption that lace means lingerie is intended for someone else’s eyes. Is it outside the realm of possibility that women (in the past or today) would wear nice things because the women themselves enjoy ornamentation? This is a discouraging message, and a good example of current cultural attitudes affecting the interpretation of material culture.

  3. Emily Spivack says:

    Very good point, Barbara. I was basing that assumption on something I’d read in the original BBC History piece.

  4. Sandy Butler says:

    To me it looks like this was a combination bra/corset,
    with the long waisted piece pictured at the side of the item being laced through the grommet holes in the back,
    which would also cinch the waist??

  5. isabelle says:

    Fashion was important, even back then? Back when? When we became tool using creatures scratching on walls? Artistry, ornamentation and beauty are not modern constructs and even less sophisticated animals jazz up their existing features for the purpose of attracting the opposite sex. Jeez, just because this epoch has La Perla doesn’t mean highlighting breasts is a.new thing, and style only a recent development.

  6. Vera Ahlgren says:

    Lace and decoration were commonly used in the garments of both genders in history, so the fact that the bra had lace is in no way evidence that it was meant for “some one else’s eyes”. Big breasts are painful to carry without bras. Is a satirical man the best source to find out why women really wore bras? Are the male comedians of today the best source for future historians to reveal why today’s women act in the way they do?

  7. Andrew S says:

    Looks like a very well-made article. Though it also looks like we are only seeing part of it, from the fastening at the back it seems as though it would originally have covered most of the ribcage, so kind of halfway between a bra and a corset

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement