February 21, 2012
Is New Zealand Too Dangerous for Cycling?
![]()

Reminder signs like this one near Moeraki, on the East Coast, are common in New Zealand. While cyclists are almost sure to notice them, drowsy drivers might not.
In almost every email she sends me, my mother reminds me to stick to the left side of the road, and so I do.
But two weeks ago, on a rural stretch of highway between Geraldine and Fairlie, I saw an honesty box advertising eggs across the highway, and I made a U-turn to check it out. A moment later, a pickup truck followed me in my tracks and pulled up beside me in the gravel driveway. The man at the wheel said, “G’day,” and not unkindly began chatting with me about homegrown eggs, fly fishing and the Catlins, the down-south region where I was headed. Then he got to business:
“I saw what you did back there, cutting across the road like that,” he said.
“Oh, but I looked behind me. There was nobody there,” I answered.
“But look what you’re wearing,” he said. I had on a blue jacket and green shorts. “In those colors, I can’t see you.”
Couldn’t see me? I get it—no neon colors—but what? Was I invisible?
“But you said you saw—”
“New Zealand,” he cut in, “has one of the worst accident rates for cycling in the world. There’s a lot of publicity about this, but cyclists need to help themselves out, too.”
His advice? Wear a neon-yellow vest.
Fair enough, and while I have not yet bought a vest (I know—I should) I have been riding ever since with my neon rain poncho wrapped around the rear of my bike. I have also done some homework, and though I can’t confirm that cyclists die more frequently in car collisions in New Zealand than elsewhere, the man was generally right: Kiwis are dangerous drivers, responsible for some of world’s highest traffic death rates. In 2011, 8.9 people died in car crashes per 100,000 people in New Zealand, the ninth highest rate in the world, according to a recent report from the International Transport Forum. (Britain bottomed out that list at 3.8 traffic deaths per 100,000 people, while Malaysia ranked highest at 23.8 per 100,000.) According to the same report, “New Zealand had 9.1 deaths per billion vehicle kilometres travelled in 2008—more than twice the lowest rate of 3.9 in Iceland. South Korea had the highest rate of 20.1 deaths.” And the man also was right that talk of car-bicycle collisions has been hot. It’s all over the news: In late 2010, five cyclists in five days were struck and killed on New Zealand roadways. And in September 2009, a woman evidently not watching the road ran over four cyclists at once in Auckland.
Most of these terrible events certainly were accidents, but some bicycle-auto incidents aren’t accidents at all. Two American cycle tourists—journalists and colleagues of mine who, by coincidence, I chanced to meet in Nelson Lakes National Park—were attacked recently by a driver near Wellington. The man behind the wheel was apparently stirred into a rage by the sight of the pair pedaling along the road; he leaped from his vehicle and physically assaulted one of the two.

Frequent memorials, like this grim white cross on New Zealand's coastal Highway 1, remind passersby of the perils of the roads.
And there was the highly publicized case in early 2010 of a Christchurch gentleman named Richard Freeman who threatened to “nail” cyclists with his black H-2 Hummer. He claimed to have already knocked two cyclists off the road and brazenly said he’d do it again. Police eventually became involved in the online frenzy of arguing between local cyclists and Freeman, who lives off of Dyers Pass Road, a popular cycling route I pedaled in early February. He eventually retracted his threat, but I trust he’s still a bike-hater. Moreover, his words still hang in the air for us on bicycles to ponder every time we hear the roar of a vehicle approaching from behind. And they also leave us wondering: Who were the cyclists that he claims to have blown off their bikes?
One of the most tragic and alarming collisions took place just over a year ago. German touring cyclist Mia Susanne Pusch, 19, had recently blogged about the dangers of riding a bicycle on New Zealand roadways. She railed against the callous, brash driving of truck drivers, calling them “beasts” and noting how closely they tended to pass her. Days later, a truck driver hit and killed Pusch. I, too, have nearly been knocked off my bike by closely passing truckers–many of whom drag double trailers that swerve uncontrollably like sheets in the wind. Many of the trucks are loaded with stock en route to meat factories, and I have seen firsthand the consequences of truckers driving carelessly: Near Kaikoura, back in January, my family and I saw the crushed and mangled corpses of sheep lining the road after a stock truck overturned.
So who is usually at fault in bike-car accidents? I tend to believe that cyclists, well knowing the risks of the highway, tend to do all they can most times to avoid collisions, whereas drivers have less need to worry about immediate consequences of carelessness. (A driver can fall asleep and his/her car keep moving, whereas a bicycle will usually fall over if not carefully operated. In other words, riding a bicycle requires awareness; driving doesn’t always.) Moreover, evidence reported last year in Australia suggests that cyclists, having a higher vantage point than most drivers and no obstructive barriers to their immediate vision, are more aware of their surroundings than drivers. I entirely agree.

Even without high-visibility clothing, the author is plainly visible while cycling on a gray, wet day near Dunedin. But Kiwi drivers have a relatively high tendency to hit things they didn't mean to, including cyclists.
So, is it safe to travel in New Zealand by bicycle? That’s the question asked on this forum, Travelling Two: Bike Touring Inspiration, and the conclusion seems to be “not especially.” Narrow bridges, apathetic drivers unwilling to brake, close passing and road rage are points that come up, and I’ve encountered most of these in the last five weeks. And while graphic billboards placed along New Zealand’s highways continually remind drivers not to eat, text, look at maps or doze off behind the wheel, these signs are hardly consoling for cyclists.
My last words (for today): I wear a bright blue jacket and keep a neon poncho around the rear of my bicycle, and if you say you can’t see me, I think you’re exaggerating. And if you do see me, please give me some space, because I’m as far to the left as I can be. Mom’s orders.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
10 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
























I live in NZ and I’m a keen cyclist. Unfortunately the New Zealand State Highway system is not really designed with cyclists in mind, it’s primary purpose seems to be for heavy logging and stock trucks. The standard of driver education in New Zealand also seems to vary greatly. Drunk driving is still quite common, particularly in rural areas. Drivers are not required to have insurance on their vehicles and the quality of the vehicle fleet is poor – there are lots of older, poorly maintained vehicles on the road. Unfortunately these factors lead to a high accident rate on the road, with cyclists often involved.
In the cities, very few urban areas have integrated cycle networks. Some cities are better than others, Wellington and Nelson are quite good for cyclists with plenty of on road and off road cycle paths. Kiwi drivers attitudes towards cyclists are certainly improving, but there is still too much anomosty between drivers and cyclists.
I disagree that the cyclist in the picture is plainly visible. Not at 60mph he’s not. Any bicyclist who heads out on the road without neon and flashing lights is taking his life in his hands. Not just in NZ either. This should be basic knowledge in 2012.
If you can’t see a cyclist, when you are driving at 60 MPH, you should NOT be allowed to drive, or you should drive a heck of a lot slower. Seeing and avoiding cyclists is *trivially* simple. Really, if you can’t do it, walk instead.
Regarding my visibility in the photo above, what the camera didn’t catch was the powerful blink of my rear flashing light, which I always turn on in bad weather. Even without it, though – and viewed at 60 miles per hour – I believe I am quite visible to anyone with road-worthy vision who is keeping their eyes on the road, as they should be doing while driving. And while I am not opposed to high-visibility clothing, I just don’t think such garments are necessary. I venture to say that drivers who don’t see cyclists either don’t have their eyes on the road or are blinded by some part of their own vehicle, and I don’t think it’s fair to pin the blame on cyclists who get struck by distracted drivers, saying it was their lack of brightly colored clothing that caused the accident; almost always, bad driving causes collisions. Moreover, I point out that virtually no popular motor vehicle is colored neon yellow or orange. Rather, cars are often extremely camouflaged, colored such tones as gray, green, brown – anything but high-visibility, in fact.
What color is your car? Why isn’t it neon or orange?
Believe all you want that your visible and that it’s the drivers fault. It is still you who will end up injured or dead. In this picture you are in the lane, and while this road is straight and there is no oncoming traffic visible, if there was traffic coming you would require a car to almost come to a complete stop. If you were on a corner, the car can either follow you barely moving, or pass dangerously. Many times in New Zealand I was lucky not to nail a biker as I came around a corner at road speed and there is a biker crawling along. It is very easy to understand the road rage of someone who lives on a road that is constantly slowed down by bikers.
There is little more distressing than reading of the death of a cyclist on our NZ roads. However I have to say that reading ill-informed blog comments on the subject does rank right up there for me. For just on 20 years I have been running a Christchurch based cycle company and in that time I have learned a number of things.
The primary learning is that as a cyclist we have to be very proactive about our own safety. Unfortunately, there seems to be a recent mantra around cyclists rights and what we have a right to do. Its cold comfort being ‘right’ while you recover in a hospital bed – or worse. Mia’s death was sad – but railing against truckers while cycling down main highways wearing blacks and browns…..?
A great NZ cycle experience for me means getting off the main highways. We have an absolute ban on cycling between Geraldine and Farlie for example. The road is fast, narrow, no shoulder and blind corners. Instead, cycle down to Pleasant Point and up via Cave. Better roads, better experience. Basic research would identify that.
Equally around being pro-active with clothing. Alistair, if you know you should buy a bright coloured vest – then just do it! Please don’t tell me your dull blue jacket is a fair alternative. As for dragging up unrelated news items about Christchurch hummer drivers or dead sheep, – give us a break, this blog deserves better! Be assured I think I could find similar unrelated examples from almost any country. Bob – is there really a high incidence of drunken driving on rural roads? Really?
There is great cycling on NZ roads and some basic research and being proactive about your personal safety is the key. Being right and being dead just doesn’t do it for me!
Hi Michael – Thanks for the comment. It’s true: In this photo my pannier juts about 15 inches into the lane, which would have inconvenienced a passing driver. However, there was very little traffic on this highway. On busier roadways, I tightly hug the shoulder.
But you seem to be suggesting that cyclists are expected to apologize to drivers for using the road. Didn’t paved roads and bicycles exist before automobiles? Maybe it’s drivers that need to take a step back and think hard about sharing the road instead of, as you describe above, passing cyclists “dangerously.”
And thanks for the reminder: Like any sensible cyclist, I know it’s my life that’s at risk when drivers aren’t paying close attention.
-Alastair
Interesting piece about riding in NZ. I have just completed a three month bike tour around New Zealand and found that I had very few problems with the drivers. I have to agree with Geoff’s comments that prior research about your route is essential.
Having discussed riding in NZ with a number of fellow tourers from Europe, NZ and North America, it appears that riders from countries that either have wider hard shoulders (US and Canada) or more extensive cycle lane networks(Germany and Holland) had more issues with NZ roads.
Although there are issues with a small minority of NZ drivers, they are well worth overcoming in order to experience the amazing scenery and great experiences that NZ provides.
I absolutely respect the rights of cyclists to use the roads. My husband and I like seeing cyclists on the road and go out of our way to drive courteously around them. But I have many times seen cyclists on the narrow, winding roads in Southwest France (where cycling fatalities are not uncommon) wearing, basically, asphalt-colored clothing. And they often appear to be unaware of just how difficult it is for drivers to see them.
One local, French cycling club bought club shirts with a bright, neon-yellow band across the chest and back of a gray shirt. Very flashy– except that when the riders were hunched over in racing position, the neon yellow wasn’t visible from the rear! Apparently, no one had bothered to check what the riders actually looked like to overtaking drivers.
In our experience cyclists wearing a plain white tee shirt are actually the most visible in daytime. Please think about using this cheap, available solution before railing against drivers who “ought” to see you– but may not.
I think a bit of perspective is needed about the “risk” of cycling in NZ. If we look at the crash stats for all the world (not just the 33 countries in the ITF study) you see that NZ is one of the 30 lowest (out of ~200 countries) for fatals per capita, and less than half the worldwide average. I note too that the US has a fatal rate 50% higher than NZ.
Of course NZ also has one of the highest car ownership rates in the world (top 5), so it’s probably not surprising the per capita rate is not better. If we look at fatals per vehicle, NZ now ranks in the top 15 in the world.
As for cycling risk? From NZ travel data, on average one has to cycle for over 25,000 hrs before suffering a serious injury, and more than 2 million hours before a fatality.
It’s still not brilliant; both the infrastructure and driver behaviour could be better. But let’s not paint NZ as some road safety hellhole, when it’s clearly not.