February 7, 2012
How Much the Hope Diamond is Worth and Other Questions From Our Readers

How much is the Hope Diamond worth? Ask Smithsonian.
Our inquisitive readers are rising to the challenge we gave them last month. The questions are pouring in and we’re ready for more. Do you have any questions for our curators? Submit your questions here.
How much is the Hope Diamond worth? — Marjorie Mathews, Silver Spring, Maryland
That’s the most popular question we get, but we don’t really satisfy people by giving them a number. There are a number of answers, but the best one is that we honestly don’t know. It’s a little bit like Liz Taylor’s jewels being sold in December—all kinds of people guessed at what they would sell for, but everybody I know was way off. Only when those pieces were opened up to bidding at a public auction could you find out what their values were. When they were sold, then at least for that day and that night you could say, well, they were worth that much. The Hope Diamond is kind of the same way, but more so. There’s simply nothing else like it. So how do you put a value on the history, on the fact it’s been here on display for over 50 years and a few hundred million people have seen it, and on that fact it’s a rare blue diamond on top of everything else? You don’t. – Jeffrey E. Post, mineralogist, National Museum of Natural History
What’s the worst impact of ocean acidification so far?- Nancy Schaefer, Virginia Beach, Virginia
The impacts of ocean acidification are really just starting to be felt, but two big reports that came out in 2011 show that it could have very serious effects on coral reefs. These studies did not measure the warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, but rather its effect of making the ocean more acidic when it dissolves in the ocean. Places where large amounts of carbon dioxide seep into the water from the sea floor provide a natural experiment and show us how ocean waters might look, say, 50 or 100 years from now. Both studies showed branching, lacy, delicate coral forms are likely to disappear, and with them that kind of three-dimensional complexity so many species depend on. Also, other species that build a stony skeleton or shell, such as oysters or mussels, are likely to be affected. This happens because acidification makes carbonate ions, which these species need for their skeletons, less abundant.
Nancy Knowlton, marine biologist
National Museum of Natural History
Art and artifacts from ancient South Pacific and Pacific Northwest tribes have similarities in form and function. Is it possible that early Hawaiians caught part of the Kuroshio Current of the North Pacific Gyre to end up along the northwest coast of America from northern California to Alaska? — April Amy Croan, Maple Valley, Washington
Those similarities have given rise to various theories, including trans-Pacific navigation, independent drifts of floating artifacts, inadvertent crossings by ships that have lost their rudders or rigging, or whales harpooned in one area that died or were captured in a distant place. Some connections are well-known, like feather garment fragments found in an archaeological site in Southeast Alaska that appear to have been brought there by whaling ships that had stopped in the Hawaiian Islands, a regular route for 19th-century whalers. Before the period of European contact, the greatest similarities are with the southwest Pacific, not Hawaii. The Kushiro current would have facilitated Asian coastal contacts with northwestern North America, but would not have helped Hawaiians. The problem of identification is one of context, form and dating. Most of the reported similarities are either out of their original context (which can’t be reconstructed), or their form is not specific enough to relate to another area’s style, or the date of creation cannot be established. To date there is no acceptable proof for South Pacific-Northwest Coast historical connections that predates the European whaling era, except for links that follow the coastal region of the North Pacific into Alaska.
William Fitzhugh, archeologist
Natural History Museum
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
3 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI























Have Marine Scientists and Petroleum Chemists and Engineers yet figured a way to clean the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico of the heavy crude sludge which we know has to be there, so as to lessen its impact upon the flora ands fauna of the Gulf? I personally have no expertise or education that would even give me an idea about what is and isn’t possible, given today’s technology, and assuming thats cost was not a factor. I’ve thought about unmanned submarines with vacuum cleaning equipment that might be able to suck it up into storage tanks, but I have no idea whether we;ve ever developed craft that can operate at such great depths. I remember WWII movies in my youth, always showing submarines settled on the ocean bottom, running silently, to evade the enemy depth charges, but was that just Hollywood, or did they have suchc deep water capabilities, back in the 1940′s. Dana Andrews would surely know . . . up scope . . . down scope, all ahead full . . . dive . . . . dive . . . . dive . . . . fire 1 . . . etc. Lots of drama, but what was the science thenl and what is it, today?
Hello Mr. Fitzhugh,
I just found that you took time to answer my question. Thank you!
I am aware that by the year 1300, the Maori are determined to have been descended from the Polynesian peoples, but had morphed into a truly indigenous form. And that whaling migration routes from the N Pacific and S Pacific never cross. I am interested in possible contact between the NW coast and ancient whaling cultures that eventually populated Hawaii, originating centuries earlier from present day Taiwan. Weren’t the whaling cultures of ancient Oceana skilled enough in seafaring and wayfinding to make that voyage? The prior Chinese global sea expeditions had the ability and later voyagers, Cook and Heyerdahl, relate similar if not the exact same place names and art/tool construction. While no definite proof exists, do you think there is still a possibility of early contact? How else would you explain these commonalities?
Also, can you please change my name to Amy Croan?
Thanks again!
-Amy
Amy,
They certainly had the capability to make long ocean voyages and could have reached the northwest coast. The problem is “did they?” And there we don’t have proof–yet. Archaeology is full of stories where opinion has been reversed by new discoveries. Too often cultures produce similarities, but to prove contact the data have to be very specific. For instance this year a piece of cast bronze bronze was found in an Eskimo site around Bering Strait. Eskimos did not know how to cast bronze, and the piece looks like part of a horse harness buckle. So there is definite proof, in this case of hand-to-hand trade between an area far from Bering Strait where horse-riding occurred and Alaska.