July 13, 2009
Did Dinosaurs Roar?
I will never forget seeing Jurassic Park for the first time in the summer of 1993. Not only did the dinosaurs look real, but they sounded real, each dinosaur having its own array of chirps, bellows, hoots, and roars. According to paleontologist Phil Senter, however, dinosaurs may not have been able to make any of these sounds.
In a paper recently published in the journal Historical Biology, Senter reviewed the evolution of animal sounds during the Paleozoic (about 542 to 251 million years ago) and Mesozoic (about 251 to 65 million years ago). Insects were among the first sound makers, but what about dinosaurs? Unfortunately, we cannot study a living Triceratops, Apatosaurus, or Albertosaurus to find out, but crocodylians and birds (the closest living relatives of dinosaurs) might provide some clues.
According to Senter, crocodylians vocalize by using their larynx, a soft-tissue structure in the throat that does not fossilize. Since all the different types of living crocodylians (alligators, crocodiles, and gharials) vocalize this way, it is probable that their common ancestor that lived during the Late Cretaceous did too, but whether their even earlier relatives could do so is unknown.
Birds, on the other hand, vocalize through an organ in their throat called the syrinx. This is a different organ from the larynx of crocodylians, and thus Senter argues that vocalization in the two groups evolved independently. This would mean that the last common ancestor of birds and crocodylians (which would also be an ancestor of dinosaurs and pterosaurs) might not have been able to vocalize at all.
Could some dinosaurs have independently evolved the ability to vocalize, just as birds and crocodylians did? Researchers like David Weishampel have, after all, demonstrated the potential use of hadrosaur crests as resonating chambers when the animals wanted to communicate over long distances. Recent research presented at last year’s annual Society of Vertebrate Paleontology meeting, too, suggests that at least some hadrosaurs could have been communicative creatures. Indeed, dinosaurs may not have vocalized the same way that crocodylians or birds do, and even if their soft-tissue vocalization organs were not preserved, scientists can still study their fossilized inner ears to try and understand what sounds they might have been able to hear. A dinosaur with sensitive ears, for example, might have been more communicative, but unfortunately there are no living non-avian dinosaurs to test this idea.
Did dinosaurs sound just like they do in the movies? Probably not, especially since most “dinosaur” sounds you hear are actually mash-ups of vocalizations made by different modern animals. Since the organs they would have used to vocalize with did not fossilize, however, we may never know what kind of sounds they made (if they were able to make them at all). Given the difficulty getting at this question, then, I say that we should continue to let hadrosaurs bellow and tyrannosaurs roar until we find hard evidence that they could not.
Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.
7 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI























Can’t vocalize eh? Just like a little so-called DINOSAURS IN SPACE?! Clearly support for Dinosaurs in Space is greater than ever!
I’d actually be very surprised if some sort of vocalization structure didn’t evolve in dinosaurs as well–it just seems far too useful of an evolutionary adaptation to do without for so many millions of years.
All that is needed is a tube long enough, breath and some musculature coordinated enough to create intonations. I attended a Vertebrate paleontology session a few years back and one individual demonstrated a long smooth “bore” tube that he was able to get some sounds to produce. I suggested he try a corrugated tube, like those available for drainage systems (more resembling the trachea of many animals including birds). This corrugated tube could provide more eddy-producing surfaces that would encourage greater intonation. Constricting the tube diameter and length would produce greater ranges of sounds like valves on a trumpet, not only providing basic “naturals” but “sharps” and “flats”, broadening the intonation range of a vocal tube. Relaxing and tightening the tube could allow more fluttering sounds, like roars growls and such. The main issue would be the interface between “brain” and vocalizing organs. Birds do it. Why not? Imagine the vocal resonances of an Apatasaurus’s or Diplodocus’s trachea.
Given that birds are very probably, some paleozoologists say surely, descendants of at least one branch of dinosaurians; and that all birds we know have vocal capabilities courtesy of their syrinxes; that many birds have very sophisticated syrinxes and are producers of an extremely wide array of calls, alarms and songs, it is inconceivable that many dinosaurians would not have an array of sounds themselves. Maybe these didn’t approach the complexity of modern birds but surely there must have been a respectable range of vocalizations among many genera.
(edited for a letter omission) N.W.W.
Very unscientific counterargument: Vuvuzelas. Seems you just need wind going through a long tube to roar, so there’s that.
As a retired physics teacher and ham radio operator (VE7SVR), I am amazed at the lack of recognition of head shapes for infrasound production.
(1) Tube like structures on the head (search “Parasaurolophus” and “lambeosaurines”) to me are obvious resonant chambers, probably to tune the sounds from the throat or create their own sounds with muscles, with certain harmonics for different individuals and species, and probably tuning mechanisms.
(2) A different feature would be the wide flat fins on the head (search “ceratopsian”), with a ring of bone, which are perfectly designed as drums. As muscle controlled diaphragms, they can create sound different from the throat mechanism, but with nerve endings they can also resonate as muscle-tuned receivers. The triceratops skull has no ring, but is concave and with an outer upturned rim which has what look like muscle attachment points. I suggest it had a drum skin floating above the bony frill.
Where in the science literature is this studied? I come up with almost nothing in my searches.
Of course, such features could be used for other purposes, perhaps bone tubes for butting, and fin-drums for colorful displays.
Stephen Holland,
There is plenty of literature debating the possibility of lambeosaurines using their crests to produce sound, going back to 1931. It’s one of the most well-known debates in the field. See for instance:
Wiman, Carl (1931). “Parasaurolophus tubicen, n. sp. aus der Kreide in New Mexico” (in German). Nova Acta Regia Societas Scientarum Upsaliensis, series 4 7 (5): 1–11.
Hopson, James A. (1975). “The evolution of cranial display structures in hadrosaurian dinosaurs”. Paleobiology 1 (1): 21–43.
Weishampel, David B. (1981). “Acoustic analyses of potential vocalization in lambeosaurine dinosaurs (Reptilia:Ornithischia)”. Paleobiology 7 (2): 252–261.
Diegert, Carl F.; and Williamson, Thomas E. (1998). “A digital acoustic model of the lambeosaurine hadrosaur Parasaurolophus tubicen”. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18 (3, Suppl.): 38A.