Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


July 20, 2009

Nothronychus Raises Questions About Dino Diet

The skeleton of Nothronychus. The recoverd parts are in white. From the Proceedings of the Royal Society B paer.

The skeleton of Nothronychus. The recovered parts are in white. From the Proceedings of the Royal Society B paper.

Everybody knows that dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor were meat eaters, but what might come as a shock is that some of their close relatives often ate plants.

When I was a kid things were simple. Theropod dinosaurs were meat-eaters and all the rest were plant-eaters. Since the 1980s, though, numerous discoveries have shed light on a group of coelurosaurs (the group of theropods to which Tyrannosaurus and Velociraptor also belong) called therizinosaurs. These dinosaurs had beaks, small heads, long necks, barrel-shaped bodies, and long arms tipped with huge claws, yet some of them had feathers and they were close relatives of the dinosaurs that gave rise to the first birds. One such therizinosaur was Nothronychus, and a nearly complete skeleton of this dinosaur was just announced in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

The approximately 90-million-year-old Nothronychus was originally described from bones found in the American southwest in 2001. There was enough of it left to tell that it was a therizinosaur, but this new skeleton, found in southern Utah, is much more extensive. As such it provides for better evolutionary comparisons not only to other therizinosaurs, but to other coelurosaurs as well.

What the researchers found was that the therizinosaurs were rooted near the base of the maniraptoran family tree (the maniraptorans being that group of coelurosaurs that contains the ornithomimosaurs, dromaeosaurs, birds, and a few others). In other words, the earliest members of the therizinosaur lineage split off before the first members of other maniraptoran dinosaurs did. What makes this especially interesting is that this placement seems to reveal some important shifts in coelurosaur evolution.

It appears that the earliest coelurosaurs (including the ancestors of the tyrannosaurs) were hypercarnivorous, or that they only ate meat. Interestingly, though, several groups of dinosaurs near the base of the maniraptoran family tree show adaptations for plant eating; the dromaeosaurs (or “raptors”) are the only members of this larger group that appear to have exclusively eaten meat. Rather than being an abnormality, herbivory might have been rather common among the maniraptorans.

What this suggests is that the last common ancestor of the maniraptoran dinosaurs might have been herbivorous or omnivorous. This hypothesis will have to be tested and re-tested as more fossil evidence comes to light, but if the researchers are correct then sometime around 160 million years ago there lived an omnivorous or herbivorous dinosaur ancestral to all maniraptorans. Rather than being the rule, predators like Velociraptor might have been oddballs compared to the rest of their close kin.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

6 Comments »

  1. Zach Miller says:

    The idea of a basally omnivorous Maniraptora is certainly interesting. It makes me wonder how many theropods may have been omnivorous, maybe not as a rule, but opprotunistically. Zanno & Co. don’t mention this in the paper (oddly), but alvarezsaurs were probably myrmecophageous, which is an extreme form of insectivory.

  2. Michael Ogden Erickson says:

    “It makes me wonder how many theropods may have been omnivorous, maybe not as a rule, but opprotunistically.”

    I actually have a hard time beleiving that Tyrannosaurus rex woldn’t have eaten some fruit occasionally, as we now know crocodilians do.

  3. Zach Miller says:

    No evidence of fruit in the Cretaceous yet, Mike. Now, there were primitive flowering plants, but then you’ve got a new question. What came first, fruit or flowers? Don’t know if that question’s been answered yet–you’d have to ask a botanist!

  4. Michael Ogden Erickson says:

    No friut in the Cretaceous? Whoa. I thought for sure there was some kind of primitive friut. Then again, my knowledge of Cretaceous plants and such is mostly crap, so…

  5. [...] of the dinosaur hall contains some unusual displays. One features a dinosaur called Falcarius, a herbivorous relative of the “raptor” dinosaurs that was described in 2005 and may have been covered in a kind of feathery fuzz! To its right lies [...]

  6. DM Kirwin says:

    Any thought that it might have been an insect eater. That would explain the large claws and the fact it doesn’t have front teeth.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement