Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
Dinosaur Tracking

Where paleontology meets pop culture

Hominid Hunting

Meet the members of the tangled human family tree

Innovations

How human ingenuity is changing the way we live

Surprising Science

Ideas, news and discoveries from the world of science


May 23, 2012

Human Evolution Discoveries in Iraq

The entrance to Shanidar Cave in northern Iraq. Image courtesy of Flickr user Kurdistan Photo كوردستان

Iraq is the home of the Fertile Crescent, the Cradle of Civilization. But the country’s importance in human history goes back even further, to the time of the Neanderthals. In 1951, American archaeologist Ralph Solecki discovered Neanderthal remains in Shanidar Cave. The cave sits in the Zagros Mountains in the Kurdistan region of northern Iraq, about 250 miles north of Baghdad. From 1951 to 1960, Solecki and colleagues excavated the cave and recovered fossils belonging to 10 individuals dating to between 65,000 and 35,000 years ago. Politics prevented further archaeological work, but the Shanidar fossils still provide important insights on the Neanderthals of West Asia. Here are a few of the most intriguing finds:

Shanidar 1: Nicknamed Nandy, Shanidar 1 lived sometime between 45,000 and 35,000 years ago. He had a hard life. A blow to the head in his youth probably blinded him in his left eye. A withered right arm and leg suggest the head injury probably also caused brain damage that paralyzed the right side of Nandy’s body. He also fractured his foot at some point. Yet his bones all show signs of healing, and Nandy lived to be a senior citizen by Neanderthal standards, dying sometime between the ages of 35 and 45. The find revealed that Neanderthals must have taken care of their sick and wounded.

Shanidar 3: Also an adult male, Shanidar 3 had plenty of problems of his own. In addition to suffering from arthritis, the Neanderthal seems to have been violently attacked. A tiny groove on one of his ribs indicates he was probably struck in the chest. A 2009 analysis (PDF) points to a modern human, Homo sapiens, as the assailant. Based on experimental stabbings of pig carcasses, a team led by Steven Churchill of Duke University determined that the most likely weapon was some kind of dart, shot from long range. Because modern humans are the only hominids known to have made projectile weapons, the researchers blamed our species for the wound. The wound may have harmed Shandiar 3′s lungs, but it’s possible he survived the attack. A callous that formed over the groove shows that he must have lived at least a few week after the incident. And modern people with similar injuries can survive even with little medical care.

Today, you can examine Shanidar 3 for yourself at Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History, where the fossil is on display.

Shanidar 4: Yet another adult male, Shanidar 4 was found on his side curled up in the fetal position. An analysis of the ancient pollen found in association with the fossilized skeleton revealed bright flowers had been brought into the cave. Solecki interpreted the pollen studies as evidence that Neanderthals buried their dead and adorned the graves with flowers, suggesting Neanderthals had rituals. Skeptical anthropologists say natural forces—perhaps burrowing rodents—introduced the pretty flora into the cave. Although Neanderthals might not have decorated the graves, they were responsible for burying at least some of the individuals in Shanidar.



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

5 Comments »

  1. David Wrausmann says:

    Is Shanidar still open to archaeologists?

  2. Erin Wayman says:

    I’m not aware of any ongoing work at Shanidar. I think political tensions continue to be a problem. But I found a video of Ralph Solecki returning to Shanidar some 40 years after he worked there. I imagine it must have been filmed before the Iraq War. It’s interesting to see the cave and the region’s environment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh2pXEvsgZU

  3. Rob Gargett says:

    Wow! Until I saw that Paul Pettitt had published an entire book on the matter of Middle Palaeolithic buiral, I thought that the recent discovery that the Roc de Marsal Neanderthal child’s inhumation was natural would have put a serious dent in the myth of burial at that time depth. As usual, Erin, I must beg to differ with your offering. “The Roc de Marsal Neandertal child: A reassessment of its status as a deliberate burial,” by Denis Sandgathe, et al. is the first of his and his colleagues’ efforts to find out the reality of the depositional circumstances of the putative Neanderthal and other burials in the Middle Palaeolithic. It can be accessed here, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004724841100090X. They are also featured on a series hosted by Alan Alda, which was filmed during their excavations at the Roc de Marsal. Pettitt, by the way, slavishly refers to my own work on the issue as “literature-base.” As far as I know his book is far more literature based than anything I ever published. So, your readers are free to make up their own minds. And, as you know, their inquiring minds are always welcome at thesubversivearchaeologist.blogspot.com
    Keep the hits coming!
    Rob

  4. John Howard says:

    The groove in the bone of the Neanderthal victim was obviously inflicted by an angry left handed fellow Neanderthal who specialized in making short arrows and whose sister was infertal (following a failed pregnancy) and who had just returned from a hunt still starving, and had struck the blow as a reaction to the sarcastic remarks aimed at him by his victim for his failure to down a sabre toothed tiger. This offers clear proof that Neanderthals could wield sarcasm much earlier than previously assumed.

    The angle and depth of the bone-groove suggests that this was not his first hunting failure. Also he was obviously wearing some kind of hat when he attacked, though the materials are uncertain.

    This proves further that it is essential, if you are a government-subsidized science clown impressing co-eds during field studies, to make up lots of crap based on tiny ambiguous bits of evidence as if you are Sherlock Holmes on paleolithic steroids endowed with super-human deductive powers (which, unfortunately, cannot be verified by any corroborative evidence). It also helps to have a tan and wear cargo pants if the co-eds are from Harvard.

  5. Mary Ewton says:

    Please tell me what the three man-made constructions with paths laid to them contain.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement