Blogs

  • News
  • |
  • Art
  • |
  • History
  • |
  • Food and Travel
  • |
  • Science
SmartNews

Keeping You Current

Around the Mall

Scenes and sightings from Smithsonian museums and beyond


December 6, 2012 10:29 am

Does Blood Doping Even Work?

In nearly every sport, high-profile athletes—from Marion Jones to Lance Armstrong—have taken performance-enhancing drugs to compete with the rest of their field and set off doping scandals. And as if the shame of being caught wasn’t enough to make these athletes regret their decisions, there’s another catch. Those drugs might not actually be performance enhancing. A recent study found no evidence that using blood doping drugs gives elite athletes any advantage.

Discovery writes:

In a review study published today in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, [Adam] Cohen and his colleagues sifted through existing studies of EPO’s effect on athletic performance. His main complaint is that these studies did not use elite athletes, rather study subjects who were “moderately trained athletes.” As a result, the effects of EPO in high-level races have not been well understood, he explained.

Basically, the researchers argue that, for someone who’s just a regular athlete, blood doping works. There are all sorts of studies that show that things like erythropeitin (EPO) increase the amount of oxygen a regular body can take in and use. But in elite athletes, that effect disappears. Or, at least, that’s what the study claims. Others disagree. Discovery spoke with Michael Joyner, who studies elite athletes. He says that just because so many top athletes haven’t participated in these studies, it doesn’t mean that EPO doesn’t work on them. Discovery again:

“It’s like a red line in a car,” Joyner said about the difference between elite athletes and those participating in the previous EPO studies. “The red line is the same, but if you give them more horsepower (in this case EPO), you’re going to go faster,” said Joyner.

This claim has been made before, too. In the 1980s, researchers claimed that steroids didn’t enhance elite athlete performances. But anyone who’s seen Mark McGwire bat knows that’s simply not true. And if doping really didn’t do anything, why risk it?

More from Smithsonian.com:

Lance Armstrong Surrenders Against Doping Charges and Will be Banned for Life



***

Sign up for our free email newsletter and receive the best stories from Smithsonian.com each week.

3 Comments »

  1. What is the point of this article? It cites a study saying that doping might not work for elite athletes, but then again maybe it does. Uh, thanks for clarifying.

    Comment by Shannon Wianecki — December 6, 2012 @ 4:28 pm


  2. Wait a minute! I think you are imagining the FloJo doping scandal. She was never linked to steroids or PEDs. There was and continues to be suspicion. But perhaps you should state it as your opinion rather than assert it as fact.

    Comment by Millard Baker — December 7, 2012 @ 4:17 pm


  3. Hi Millard,

    You’re right, FloJo was never found guilty of doping. I got her and Marion Jones confused. Corrected now!

    Rose

    Comment by Rose Eveleth — December 7, 2012 @ 4:23 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Advertisement



Trending Today New Research Cool Finds

Follow Us

Travel with Smithsonian






Advertisement